학생들의 정당화 유형과 탐구형 소프트웨어의 활용에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A study of the types of students' justification and the use of dynamic software
• 발행기관: 대한수학교육학회
• 저자명: 류희찬 조완영
• 간행물 정보: 『수학교육학연구』제9권 1호, 245~261쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1999.07.31

영문 초록

Proof is an essential characteristic of mathematics and as such should be a key component in mathematics education. But, teaching proof in school mathematics have been unsuccessful for many students. The traditional approach to proofs stresses formal logic and rigorous proof. Thus, most students have difficulties of the concept of proof and students' experiences with proof do not seem meaningful to them. However, different views of proof were asserted in the reassessment of the foundations of mathematics and the nature of mathematical truth. These different views of justification need to be reflected in demonstrative geometry classes. The purpose of this study is to characterize the types of students' justification in demonstrative geometry classes taught using dynamic software. The types of justification can be organized into three categories : empirical justification, deductive justification, and authoritarian justification. Empirical justification are based on evidence from examples, whereas deductive justification are based logical reasoning. If we assume that a strong understanding of demonstrative geometry is shown when empirical justification and deductive justification coexist and benefit from each other, then students' justification should not only some empirical basis but also use chains of deductive reasoning. Thus, interaction between empirical and deductive justification is important. Dynamic geometry software can be used to design the approach to justification that can be successful in moving students toward meaningful justification of ideas. Interactive geometry software can connect visual and empirical justification to higher levels of geometric justification with logical arguments in formal proof.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 증명의 재개념화

Ⅲ. 정당화 유형과 탐구형 소프트웨어의 활용

Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언

참고문헌