학술논문
부동산 점유취득시효 완성자의 법적지위
이용수 33
- 영문명
- Legal Status upon Completion of a Prescription for Real Property Possession
- 발행기관
- 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김대규(Kim, Dae-Kyoo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『원광법학』제23권 제2호, 535~558쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A great number of studies have been conducted so far to determine the significance of the system for prescription of real property possession, reasons for it's existence, legislating procedures and conditions. The present study, thus, focuses exclusively on the legal status to be acquired after a prescription for real property is completed.
What comes in issue firstly in terms of the legal status upon completion of a prescription for real property possession is whether the owner of a real property is able to apply for acquisition of claim for registration for the purpose of acquiring possession although he can't get the possession immediately upon completion of prescription for possession.
Majority and legal precedents view such status as a thing in action, while minority supports the theory of real rights that perceives that those who complete prescription can acquire the there is also theory or actual ownership upon completion of prescription. Besides, there is also theory of legal trust in name that is deemed as a reasonable method to take advantage of theory of real fights while adjusting conflicting interests between the acquirer of prescription and the third acquirer reasonably.
You may well wonder, however, if the conventional theories and judicial precedents have placed too much weight on protecting the legal status of prescription performer in terms of prescription for real property possession, compared to its relationship with the 3rd party. It is, therefore, adequate to adopt the theory of thing in action subject to the proviso that it can't be claimed whether the change in name is made before or after expiration of prescription once the title is transferred. What is important for the party who applies for registration upon completion of prescription is who will be the owner indicated on the register at the time when possession begins.
This is because the Civil Law Act of Korea stipulates that it is not proper to protect the performer of prescription for a real property at the cost of the 3rd party who faithfully performs the legal obligations.
What is argued in this connection secondly is if the possession acquired by the performer of prescription in terms of possession of real property is an acquisition by origin or by succession. Majority affirm it as an acquisition by origin while minority considers it an acquisition by succession. The legal precedents do not take any definite stand in this regard, inclined to siding with the acquisition by succession, thought. According to an explanation of the majority which favor acquisition by origin, the possession which constitutes basis for prescription of acquisition but is limited by the right of others(e.g. the right of region) is acquired, since all restrictions imposed upon the prior possessor whill vanish unjustly at the completion of possession under the theory of acquisition by origin. However, such explanation can't be applied to the right of others (e.g mortgage) which have nothing to do with possession. Acquisition by succession should be deemed justifiable in view of transfer registration of possession.
The third issue in this context is if the right to claim for compensation in substitute will be allowed to the performer of prescription for real property possession. Although the Korean Civil Law Act does not expressly stipulate such right, theories and legal precedents in general approach to it positively. What still remains a problem awaiting solution is whether the right to claim for compensation in substitute can also be given to the prescription of real property possession.
In this regard, theories are divided into positive and negative standpoints and legal precedents are not consistent, either. It seems, however, appropriate to recognize the right to claim for compensation in substitute when the performer of prescription has claimed the acquisition by prescription for reason of completion of prescription or has already exercised the rig
목차
Ⅰ. 서 설
Ⅱ. 원소유권자와 취득시효완성자와의 법률관계
Ⅲ. 취득시효완성자와 제한물권자와의 법률관계
Ⅳ. 결 론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 경계확정의 소에 대한 재검토
- 기후변화협약의 교토의정서 협상과 비정부환경기구의 참여
- 도시계획결정에 있어서 이웃사람과 계획재량
- 한미FTA가 국내 GMO관련 법제도에 미치는 영향
- 온라인디지털콘텐츠보호에 관한 연구
- 한국 금융지주회사에 대한 적기시정조치
- 기본권의 보호와 생명과학기술의 헌법적 한계
- 儒敎立憲主義와 朝鮮의 違憲法律審判
- 영미 증거법상 전문법칙의 연혁 및 근거에 관한 고찰
- 부부재산제에 관한 민법개정법률안 소고
- 부동산 점유취득시효 완성자의 법적지위
- 필수적 공동소송에 있어 합일확정에 관한 고찰
- 국가배상법상의 가해공무원에 대한 구상권의 행사
- 행정소송상 화해의 허용성에 관한 연구
- 집합건물의 관리주체와 하자담보청구권
- 우리나라 부동산투자회사(리츠)에 관한 고찰
- 형사소송법상 재심이유에 대한 고찰
- 계약체결과정에서 설명의무의 근거
- 한국 입양법의 문제점
- 民事執行의 理想으로서의 公益
- 독일환경법에 있어서의 통합원칙
- 보험약관의 설명의무
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!