『삼국사기』 고구려본기의 분주 재론

• 영문명: On the Sidenotes of the Annals of Koguryo in the Samguk-sagi
• 발행기관: 백산학회
• 저자명: 이강래(Lee, Kang-Lae)
• 간행물 정보: 『백산학보』第67號, 101~148쪽, 전체 48쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2003.12.01

영문 초록

This article, based on the sidenotes of the annals of Koguryo Dynasty in the Samguk-sagi, examined the formative process of the sidenotes related 51 items and the editor’s attitude toward the compiling of the Samguk-sagi. For this, I made the achievements of the examination on the sidenotes of the annals of Silla Dynasty done by myself before as the logical basis. The previous achievements were digested like the following: 1) each edition has different authors; 2) the authors give more trust to our traditional viewpoint than to Chinese materials; 3) most important, the editing of the Samguk-sagi did not rely upon a particular book. Eventually, it should be pay attention to the facts that the essential conclusions of two researches are strikingly similar each other. However, in this subject I tried to place emphasis on the two different spheres. One was to speculate the existence of the original source of royal annals compiled prior to the Samguk-sagi. It must be considered the broadest source for the composing the sidenotes of Samguk-sagi. The other was to have comprehensive understanding of the author’s attitude exposed in the middle of writings the sidenotes of annals of Koguryo Dynasty. It will offer a profitable criterion to make a distinction among the original copies composed before the mid-Koryo dynasty. At the same time, the criterion could be regarded as a standard to presume the characters of editors. Needless to say, broadly but crudely existing materials of Koryo dynasty were assembled to edit the Samguk-sagi. The editors neither have quantitative room to rule out important materials intentionally, nor any motive to distort them, nor necessity to hide such a motive. In addition, although domestic materials and Chinese information were recorded together, if contradicted each other, unique domestic materials were credited almost without exception. It means that the editors gave great dependence on the domestic materials composed by the writers of Koryo dynasty or the Three Kingdoms. Based on these results, one must continue to analyze the sources or process of compilation of the Samguk-sagi within the context of the material circumstances in and out of Koryo Dynasty. Of course those subjects should be treated as a foundation to ascertain the relation with so-called Old Samguksa or Kogi, the general name of the previous historical documents in Koryo dynasty. But, now that the history of the Three Kingdoms rearranged by the people of Silla and the national history of Silla Dynasty written by its people served as the base for historical knowledge, there was no great difference in the nature of the history books compiled during the Koryo Period, either in the Old Samguksa or the Samkug-sagi.

목차

Ⅰ. 논의의 맥락

Ⅱ. 분주의 분류

Ⅲ. 분주의 검토

Ⅳ. 분주의 인식

Ⅴ. 논의의 전망

[Abstract]

키워드

三國史記 高句麗本紀 分註 古記 海東古記 Samguk-sagi Annals of Koguryo Sidenote Kogi Haedong-kogi