학술논문
컴퓨터 프로그램의 물성에 관한 재검토
이용수 179
- 영문명
- Whether a computer program is a thing in legal sense or not?
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 오병철(OH, Byoung-cheol)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第26卷 第3號, 293~323쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.02.28
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
I. Introduction
Koran Civil Code has a provision, article 98 that a thing is defined as material objects and manageable natural energy such as electricity. It has been a controversy whether computer program is a thing from a legal point of view or not. The major theory in Korea denied computer program is a thing in legal sense, but a new theory that computer program belongs to a thing is formulated in the latest paper for doctor degree. The new theory is firmly influenced by german legal theory and decision of the germen supreme court that regarded a computer program as a thing with intend to apply provisions for sales contract to a defect of standard computer program. Especially the germen supreme court has decided not only software contained tangible medium but also computer program downloaded through wireless computer network is a thing in legal sense in ASP case. However there are opposite opinions which software is not a thing but information goods. This paper tries to examine thoroughly a new theory with a critical eye.
II. Computer program as a Information goods
Computer program is never a thing for the following reasons: (1) The nature of computer program is inconsistent with the definition of a thing in the article 98, Korean Civil Code. It regulates a thing in legal sense consisted a tangible goods and manageable natural energy such as electricity. For computer program is not tangible goods but also a kind of natural energy, it is not a thing according to the regal wording. Notwithstanding decision of the germen supreme court, software is not a thing under Korean Civil Code. (2) The assumed premise of definition of a thing is exclusive domination by owner. The replication makes it impossible for a provider to exclusively dominate computer program. After a computer program provider sales a computer program to a end-user, he still has held ownership of it. In the traditional regal sense, there is no thing which a seller can keep his ownership after selling. These non-excludability and non-rivalry of is a typical nature of information goods. (3) If computer program is a thing, that is in disharmony with a property law in Korean Civil Code. Provided that a computer program is one thing and its storage is another, ownerships of them is belonged to a computer program copyright holder as an owner of a main thing on the principle of fusion under article 257 Korean Civil Code. Actually a computer program purchaser buys it from a storekeeper, in that case a storekeeper who does not hold ownership of a computer program may be a unauthorized person. It is totally impractical to think that a storekeeper has ownership of not only a storage for software but also intangible computer program. (4) To harmonize with another applicable laws, a computer program is not treated as a thing. If computer program is a thing, a reproduction without permission(piracy) may not be dealt with an infringement of copyright but larceny. That is in disagreement with decision of Korean Supreme Court.
III. Computer program as Digitalized labor
Computer program composed by digital is artificial. While an artificial thing means "objectification(Versachlichung) of labor", an computer program is "digitalized labor" on the other hand. The labor can not be separated from a person except for objectification in industrial society. In information society the labor can be separable from a person by digitalizing. The "digitalized labor" is unfamiliar with traditional legal system. We need a new legal paradigm for information society which constitutes a thing, a labor and an information(digitalized labor) as a third value.
The Roman Law system is based on traditional dualism of the credit as a labor not be separated from a person and real right as a labor separated from a person. Because intellectual property is not dominant trading subject until now, quasi-real right has remained in a nominal terminology that can not be developed to the co
목차
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 信託受託者의 補償請求權에 관한 考察
- 통행지역권의 침해와 물권적 청구권
- 독일 보험계약법 제28조의 계약상의 간접의무에 대한 연구
- UCC에 관한 저작권적 고찰
- 다수당사자 채권관계에서의 분할주의원칙 제한을 위한 합리적 모색
- 여성의 종중구성원 자격
- 온라인디지털콘텐츠 이용과 소비자보호
- 중국 불법행위법(침권책임법)의 주요 내용과 특징
- 유엔국제물품매매법(CISG)상의 계약성립 규정과 그 보충가능성에 관한 검토
- 集合物論に関する2つの系譜
- 論知識産權法定原则
- 中国創意保護的法律困境与出路
- 컴퓨터 프로그램의 물성에 관한 재검토
- 善意取得合同效力的立法解析与邏輯証成
- 法律行爲的相對无效
- 유전자변형(GMO) 생산물로 인한 손해발생과 책임법리에 관한 연구
- 청구권에 관한 제척기간과 소멸시효
- 새로운 유럽공동체법 (Rome II Regulation)상 불법행위에 관한 준거법
- 元代民事法律制度之特征
- 将来債権譲渡の効力
- 한국 법무부의 성년후견제도에 관한 민법개정안
- 中国不动产物权的基本结构
- 中國 建設用地使用權의 出讓에 관한 法的 檢討
- 消費者定型化契約在台灣的管制現況
- 2009년도 한국재산법학회 학술활동 외
- EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!