학술논문
새로운 유럽공동체법 (Rome II Regulation)상 불법행위에 관한 준거법
이용수 160
- 영문명
- THE LAW APPLICABLE TO INTERNATIONAL TORT IN THE NEW EC REGULATION (ROME II)
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 최광준(Choi, Kwang Joon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第26卷 第3號, 133~169쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.02.28
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
As of 11 January 2009, Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) will be applicable in twenty-six European Union Member States. The Rome II Regulation applies to events giving rise to damage which occur after its entry into force on 19 August 2007 in proceedings commenced after 11 January 2009. This Regulation provides conflict of law rules for tort and delict, unjust enrichment and restitution, negotiorum gestio and culpa in contrahendo. It has a wide scope covering almost all issues raised in cases of extra-contractual liability.
The majority of the rules in the Rome II Regulation are inspired by existing rules from European countries. Others are pioneering, innovative new rules. Compared to many of the national systems of private international law of non-contractual obligations, Rome II Regulation introduces precise, modern and well-targeted rules on the applicable law that are well adapted to the needs of European actors. It provides, in particular, specific rules governing a certain number of specific torts (e.g. product liability, unfair competition and acts restricting free competition, environmental damage, infringement of intellectual property rights, and industrial action). The provisions of the Regulation will considerably increase legal certainty on the European scale, while at the same time giving courts the freedom necessary to deal with new or exceptional situations.
The material scope of the Rome II Regulation is set out in Article 1. The Regulation applies to non-contractual obligations in “civil and commercial matters”, a term which is to be understood in the same sense as in the Brussels I Regulation. The Regulation would therefore not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters. Article 1(2) specifically excludes non-contractual obligations arising out of family relationships, matrimonial property regimes and succession, obligations under negotiable instruments, the personal liability of officers and members for the debts of a corporate and incorporated body, the personal liability of persons carrying out a statutory audit, the liability of settlors, trustees and beneficiaries of a trust, and, finally, non-contractual obligations arising out of nuclear damage.
The approach taken by the Commission in the Regulation is to divide non-contractual obligations into two major categories, those that arise out of a tort or delict and those that do not. The latter category would include quasi-delictual or quasi-contractual obligations, including, in particular, unjust enrichment and negotiorum gestio (agency without authority).
Article 2 provides that the Regulation is to have universal application so the uniform conflict rules laid down in the Regulation can designate the law of an EU Member State or of a third country. Rome II is not restricted to cross border or intra Community disputes. Its rules would apply and could lead to the application of Californian law in a case before a United Kingdom court brought by an American claiming damages for a traffic accident caused by a United Kingdom citizen when driving on holiday in California.
Article 3 lays down the general rules for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations arising out of a tort or delict. The law applicable is to be the law of the country in which the damage arises or is likely to arise irrespective of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred or of the country or countries in which indirect consequences of that event arise. There are two exceptions to the general rule. Article 3(2) contains a special rule that where the person claimed to be liable and the person who has allegedly sustained damage are habitually resident in the same country, the law of that country would be applicable. Article 3(3) contains a more general exception. Where it is clear from all the
circumstance
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 信託受託者의 補償請求權에 관한 考察
- 통행지역권의 침해와 물권적 청구권
- 독일 보험계약법 제28조의 계약상의 간접의무에 대한 연구
- UCC에 관한 저작권적 고찰
- 다수당사자 채권관계에서의 분할주의원칙 제한을 위한 합리적 모색
- 여성의 종중구성원 자격
- 온라인디지털콘텐츠 이용과 소비자보호
- 중국 불법행위법(침권책임법)의 주요 내용과 특징
- 유엔국제물품매매법(CISG)상의 계약성립 규정과 그 보충가능성에 관한 검토
- 集合物論に関する2つの系譜
- 論知識産權法定原则
- 中国創意保護的法律困境与出路
- 컴퓨터 프로그램의 물성에 관한 재검토
- 善意取得合同效力的立法解析与邏輯証成
- 法律行爲的相對无效
- 유전자변형(GMO) 생산물로 인한 손해발생과 책임법리에 관한 연구
- 청구권에 관한 제척기간과 소멸시효
- 새로운 유럽공동체법 (Rome II Regulation)상 불법행위에 관한 준거법
- 元代民事法律制度之特征
- 将来債権譲渡の効力
- 한국 법무부의 성년후견제도에 관한 민법개정안
- 中国不动产物权的基本结构
- 中國 建設用地使用權의 出讓에 관한 法的 檢討
- 消費者定型化契約在台灣的管制現況
- 2009년도 한국재산법학회 학술활동 외
- EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!