학술논문
EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
이용수 70
- 영문명
- The Unification of Tort Law in EU and its Possibility in East Asia
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 송오식(Song, Oh sik)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第26卷 第3號, 171~199쪽, 전체 29쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.02.28
6,280원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
1. The modernization of the Civil Code
There increases a demand for the unification and modernization of the civil law in the age of globalization. For many years contract law has been the primary issues of comparative research and thus contract law has become the first aim of successful attempts to unify private law. Torts, too, have become a main area of legislation and of intensive comparative research in EU.
2. The unification of Tort Law in EU
The ‘European Group on Tort Law’ and the ‘Study Group on European Civil Code’ have worked for the unification of tort laws. Such two working groups are using an approach analogous to that of the Lando Commission on European Contract Law. They aimed to harmonize each tort law of EU countries. Both the Study Group and the European Group are presenting proposals for Principles of European Tort Law that are conceptually and methodologically and structurally unified. This article will review recent reforms and enactments in Tort Law of Civil Codes of East Asian countries, i.e. Korea, Japan and China in particular. It is the subject matter to grope the way to harmonize and to unify the tort law.
3. The reform of the Japanese Civil Code
Japanese Civil Code is showing a good example modernization of civil law in the "new era of codification." However, Japanese Civil Code has not had overall revision other than in the field of family law since the codification. Japanese Tort Law is similar to Korean regarding the content and system of Tort Law because of historical background. It is not difficult to study as a comparative law because of its similarity to Korean Tort Law. Japan also has made an effort to modernize its civil code. In 1990s, people have called for an civil code to be understood easily. In response, Japan enacted the" Modernized Language Act" in 2004. The modernized Japanese Civil Code of 2004 has brotght various changes to the pre-existing Code in the formal aspect. Recently, Japan drew up a civil law draft to reform its civil code. However, Japan focuses on the reform of contract law.
4. The reform of the Korean Civil Code
Korean Tort Law has not been amended since the establishment of the Civil Code in 1958. Korean has dealt with the disputes related tort through the special law and the precedents. The characteristics of Korean Tort Law are the general rule of liability for fault, the distinction of fault and wrongfulness, general clause, damages for property and non-property(§KBGB 751·752). There are Traffic accident liability, Environmental Policy fundamental Act, The Mines Act, Product Liability Act, Nuclear Energy Damages Act as a special tort law. Korean Supreme Court has mitigated the general conditions of liability, i.e., negligence, wrongfulness, causation, damages. It has adopted occasionally the theory of the presumption of fact and probability of the causation on professional liability, environmental liability, product liability.
In March 1993, the Korean Assocation of Civil Law has organized the committee to promote the revision of the Civil Code. The regulation of the strict liability, the guardian liability on minors with responsibility. the user's liability, joint tort, the scope and means of damages. However, this work has not connected to the concrete result. Afterwards, Korea tried to amend such provisions of its Civil Code as involving property and obligations in 2004. However, it failed to reform its Civil Code because of the National Assembly. Korean government started reforming its civil code from 2008.
5. The draft of the Chinese Tort Law
Chinese government is now ready to maintain the tort law to change and reform the Civil Code. China still has relied upon general civil provision, special tort law and judicial interpretation.
Chinese government announced a detailed draft of Tort Law based on the mixture of civil law and common law in 2008. It is said that it combines the advantages of civil law and commo
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 信託受託者의 補償請求權에 관한 考察
- 통행지역권의 침해와 물권적 청구권
- 독일 보험계약법 제28조의 계약상의 간접의무에 대한 연구
- UCC에 관한 저작권적 고찰
- 다수당사자 채권관계에서의 분할주의원칙 제한을 위한 합리적 모색
- 여성의 종중구성원 자격
- 온라인디지털콘텐츠 이용과 소비자보호
- 중국 불법행위법(침권책임법)의 주요 내용과 특징
- 유엔국제물품매매법(CISG)상의 계약성립 규정과 그 보충가능성에 관한 검토
- 集合物論に関する2つの系譜
- 論知識産權法定原则
- 中国創意保護的法律困境与出路
- 컴퓨터 프로그램의 물성에 관한 재검토
- 善意取得合同效力的立法解析与邏輯証成
- 法律行爲的相對无效
- 유전자변형(GMO) 생산물로 인한 손해발생과 책임법리에 관한 연구
- 청구권에 관한 제척기간과 소멸시효
- 새로운 유럽공동체법 (Rome II Regulation)상 불법행위에 관한 준거법
- 元代民事法律制度之特征
- 将来債権譲渡の効力
- 한국 법무부의 성년후견제도에 관한 민법개정안
- 中国不动产物权的基本结构
- 中國 建設用地使用權의 出讓에 관한 法的 檢討
- 消費者定型化契約在台灣的管制現況
- 2009년도 한국재산법학회 학술활동 외
- EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!