월튼의 변증법적 논증론의 형사소송법적 함의

• 영문명: The Implication for a Criminal Procedure of the Dialectical Argumentation Theory of Douglas Walton
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 김성룡(Kim, Sung-Ryong)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제20권 제4호, 281~310쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.01.27

영문 초록

This paper is aimed at presenting fundamental elements on argument schemes of Douglas Walton and analyzes especially the method of persuasion dialog, argumentation diagramming and plausible argumentation. According to Douglas Walton, the purpose of his book, “Legal Argumentation and Evidence”, is to provide a new method for analyzing the structure of legal reasoning used in arguing a case and evaluation legal argumentation in general. Walton has especially emphasized that his new viewpoint is different from the traditional approaches of deductive and inductive logic because it examines legal argumentation contextually. In the Walton’s new model of argumentation presented here, the form of the argument, argumentation scheme is merely one factor in judging its worth. How the argument is used in a specific context of conversation is also crucially important. We believe that this method of dialectical argumentation of Douglas Walton will turn out to be of vitally important practical utility, both in theoretical development of criminal procedure and in tools for supporting real argumentation in criminal court of jury trial in Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말

Ⅱ. 월튼의 방법론

Ⅲ. 시 사

키워드

논증이론 오류 다이어그램 argumentation fallacy diagram