학술논문
채무불이행의 효과 – 계약의 해제
이용수 50
- 영문명
- Termination of Contract as Effect of Non-Performance
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 김동훈(Kim, Dong-Hoon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제65호, 385~417쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.12.31
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Whenever a party does not perform an obligation under the contract, the aggrieved party can resort largely to two remedies, namely compensation and termination of contract. Korean civil code declares that one remedy do not exclude the other one, which coincides with the trend of comparative law. This article deals with termination of contract as effect of non-performance, focusing on the intents of draft of Korean civil code. Discussing on the requirements of termination, there are two groups in the view of comparative law. The international legislations like CISG, PICC, PECL have the root on the common law, which lay the fundamental non-performance on the center. This concept contributes to harmonize the conflicting interests of both parties on the right to terminate. And the fault of the aggrieved party is not a requisite of termination. At the same time these legislations combine the delay of performance with the ‘additional period’(Nachfrist), which is the product of German law. Besides they prescribe the termination prior to time for performance, the so-called anticipatory non-performance , which is a product of common law. On the other hand German law starts on the ground of traditional classification of non-performance, but substantially accepted the tendency of international legislations and transformed itself. But on the judgement to allow termination German law seems to emphasize the combination with the procedural factor, additional period . About the degree of non-performance it passively prescribes, so that in the slight breach the aggrieved party can not terminate. One of the noteworthy changes is that German code discarded the fault-principle in the field of termination of contract. A comparative survey shows that there will be no great practical difference between two systems. The draft of Korean civil code takes a sort of compromise in a regard that it provides the concept of material non-performance in a passive way and additional period as the main factor in deciding to terminate or not. The material intents of the draft can be summarized below. First of all the main shift of the draft is to break with the fault principle of termination of contract. It reveals the change of contract termination from the idea of punishment on debtor to the discharge of creditor from the hopeless contract. So the draft removed the grounds of fault. Secondly some have claimed the so called fundamental nonperformance requirement be accepted as grounds of termination. The draft refused to do it because it changes too much the system of responsibility of non-performance. Besides the draft accepted the termination prior to time for performance and refused to allow the termination in case of creditor s fault. In conclusion the draft seems to be familiar with german system, which emphasizes the key role of additional period in the field of termination of contract. About the effect of termination we find just minor change. In case of returning the supplied property he has to return the earned fruit from property. If the one party cannot return the received property, he has to return the amount for the value of property to the other party, unless the other party has fault in no returning of property. This amendments are provided to clarify the present status of interpretation. The draft introduced a new provision on termination of durational contract, which has characteristic in the duration of contract. Termination of this kind of contract has effect only in a prospective way, compared to retrospective effect of termination in general according to Korean case law. The draft provides a additional ground for termination of durational contract, namely the one party can terminate the durational contract in case that he cannot anticipate
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 채무불이행과 계약해제
Ⅲ. 계약해제의 요건
Ⅳ. 계약해제의 효과
Ⅴ. 계속적 계약의 해지
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 김대정교수의 지정토론문에 대한 답변
- 「채무불이행으로 인한 손해배상에 관한 민법개정안」의 토론에 대한 답변
- <토론문에 대한 답변>
- 구남수 부장의 토론에 대한 송덕수의 답변
- 시오미 교수의 답변
- 시오미 교수의 답변
- 채무불이행의 효과 – 계약의 해제
- 金大貞教授 (韓国中央大学) の指定討論に対する返答
- 채무불이행의 성립요건
- Abgrenzung der Schadensarten und Aufwendungsersatz
- 채무불이행의 요건
- 日本における債務不履行による解除
- 계약책임의 요건
- Les conditions de la responsabilité contractuelle
- 債務不履行の成立要件
- 채무불이행으로 인한 손해배상에 관한 민법개정안
- 日本における損害賠償法の現狀と民法改正の方向性
- Les dommages‐intérêts et l’exécution en nature en cas d’inexécution des obligations contractuelles (Droit français)
- 프랑스법상 채무불이행시의 손해배상과 원상회복
- 日本의 채무불이행에 의한 해제
- 로빙거 교수 및 그리말디 교수의 발표에 대한 토론문
- 일본 손해배상법의 현상(現狀)과 민법개정의 방향성
- 급부장애의 구성요건표지들
- 독일의 관점에서 본 해제권 및 해제의 효과에 따른 권리에 대한 근본적 의문
- 독일 매매법에서 매수인의 추완이행의 장소에 관한 고찰
- Tatbestandsmerkmale der Leistungsstörung – System und Grundelemente des Leistungsstörungsrechts nach der Schuldrechtsreform –
- 金美利⋅部長判事のご質問に對する回答
- 성년후견제도 입법 과정에서의 주요 쟁점 및 향후 과제
- [토론문] 시오미 교수, 송덕수 교수의 발표에 대한 토론문
- 손해의 종류와 지출비용의 배상
- La résolution
- Grundfragen des Rücktritts‐ und des Rücktrittsfolgenrechts aus deutscher Perspektive
- 김재형 교수의 발표에 대한 토론문
- 中田裕康 교수의 『日本의 채무불이행에 의한 해제』에 관한 討論文
- 김동훈 교수의 『채무불이행 해제』 관련 발표문에 대한 討論文
- 김미리 부장판사님의 질문에 대한 답변
- 마츠모토 츠네오 교수의 발표문에 대한 토론
- 래티에 교수의 발표에 대한 토론문
- 계약해제
- Dirk Looschelders 교수⋅Mustapha Mekki 교수의 발표에 대한 토론
- 슈테판 로렌츠 교수님의 발표문에 대한 토론
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- The Current Situation, Problems and Solutions of China's Basic Legal System of Digital Economy under the Background of Global Digital Governance
- Persistence and Breakthrough: Opportunities, Missions and Challenges of School Sports Development Under the “Double Reduction” Policy
- Research on the Issue of Chinese Youth Subculture Group in the Phenomenon of “Economic Fever”
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!