본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

학교교육과 다문화교육의 커리큘럼 상호성

이용수 5

영문명
Reciprocality of curriculum in multi-cultural education in school
발행기관
국제한국언어문화학회
저자명
박인기(In-gee Park)
간행물 정보
『한국언어문화학』제8권 제1호, 23~43쪽, 전체 21쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.06.30
5,320

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Unlike traditional subject education, multi-cultural education in school becomes effective by pursuing reciprocality of curriculum. “Reciprocality of curriculum” means multi-cultural programs in various forms in school education organically interact with each other and increase the overall effect. Reciprocality of curriculum is an idealistic concept, but it can be a practical concept that aims it. Multi-cultural education in school education must pursue and aim reciprocality of curriculum as the following. First, it must reciprocality between essentialism and realism. Essentialism is education that pursues a general ideal that we should understand and share various cultures. And realism is an educational aspect that solves multi-cultural phenomenons in problematic perspective that are becoming realistic problems of our society. From the perspective of circulation of actual multi-cultural education, essentialism and realism should be complementary to each other and have continuity. Second, When teaching Korean in multi-cultural education, we should not consider ①' Korean education that makes to learn Korean functionally ②‘Korean education that makes to learn Korean culturally as different conditions and let those interact with each other and have synergy effect. Third, we need to consider reciprocality between assimilationism and pluralism. Multi-cultural education that tries to assimilate a person in multi-cultural situation to Korean culture can be assimilationism. On the other hand, pluralism is a position approving and developing pluralistically the person's own culture and current culture. Under the structure of [assimilationism vs pluralism], we need to think about what curriculum to develop in multi-cultural education. Fourth, we need to consider reciprocality through inter-subjects. And it is important to enlarge reciprocality and consilience between individual curriculum for the whole good multi-cultural education. And we need an curriculum innovation for developing of school education from the perspective of curriculum planning and management for multi-cultural education. Multi-cultural education itself is very mobile and it has a dynamic aim. Realistic multi-cultural education changes quickly on the conditions of very sensitive individuality according to situations. So we need to newly develop and provide multi-cultural programs that reflect it well. Especially we need to put effort on undergo progressive assimilation of 'language' and 'literature' subjects into multi-cultural education situations. Accordingly, we need to develop cultural talents inside language and literature and use them as the content of multi-cultural education.(Gyeongin National University)

영문 초록

목차

1. 다문화교육이 학교교육에 존재하는 방식
2. 본질주의와 현실주의의 상호성
3. 기능주의(機能主義)와 문화주의의 상호성
4. 동화주의(同化主義)와 이원주의(二元主義)의 상호성
5. 다문화교육에 관여하는 간교과적(間敎科的) 상호성
6. 교육과정 총론과 교과 교육과정 각론의 상호성
7. 결언 : 어문교육의 다문화교육 견인력 키우기
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박인기(In-gee Park). (2011).학교교육과 다문화교육의 커리큘럼 상호성. 한국언어문화학, 8 (1), 23-43

MLA

박인기(In-gee Park). "학교교육과 다문화교육의 커리큘럼 상호성." 한국언어문화학, 8.1(2011): 23-43

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제