학술논문
신용장거래에 있어서 개설의뢰인의 서류심사 및 하자통지 의무
이용수 7
- 영문명
- The applicant’s Liability of examination of document and notificiation of the discrepancies in Credit Transaction
- 발행기관
- 한국통상정보학회
- 저자명
- 박규영(Kyu-Young, Park)
- 간행물 정보
- 『통상정보연구』제8권 제4호, 107~124쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 무역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.12.30
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study is related with the judgements of our country’s supremcourt against the transaction of Letter of Credit which is beneficiary’s fraudulent trade deal. In this case I think to analyse the judgements and to present the basic grounds on which the judgements were established. In Letter of Credit transaction, there are the major parties, such as, beneficiary, issuing bank, or confirming bank and the other parties such as applicant, negotiating bank, advising bank and paying bank. Therefore, in this cases, the beneficiary, the French Weapons’ Supplier who did not shipped the commodities, created the false Bill of Lading, let his dealing bank make payment against the documents presented by him and received the proceeds from the negotiating bank or collecting bank, thereafter was bankrupted and escaped. For the first time, even though the issuing bank conceived that the presented documents were inconsistent with the terms of L/C. it did not received the payment approval from the applicant against all the discrepancies, made the negotiating bank pay the proceeds to exporter and thereafter, delivered the documents to the applicant long after the time of the issuing bank’s examination of documents. The applicant who received the documents from the issuing bank, instantly did not examine the documents and inform to the issuing bank whether he accepted the documents or not. Long time after, applicant tried to clear the goods through custom when he knew the bill of ladings were false and founded out the documents had the other discrepancies which he did not approved. As the results, the applicant, Korea Army Transportation Command claimed, that the issuing bank must refund his paid amount because issuing bank examined the documents unreasonably according to u.c.p 500 Act 13th, 14th. In spite of the applicant’s claim, the issuing bank argued that it paid the proceeds of L/C reasonably after receiving the applicant’s approval of an discrepancy of document, the delayed shipment, but for concerning the other discrepancies, the trivial ones, the applicant did not examined the document and noticed the discrepancies in reasonable time. Therefore the applicant sued the issuing bank for refunding it’s paid proceeds of L/C. Originally, this cases were risen between Korea Exchange Bank and Korea Army Transportation Command. As result of analysing the case, the contents of the case case have had same procedure actually, but the lower courts, the district and high courts all judged the issuing bank was reasonable and did not make an error. As analysing these supreme court’s judgements, the problem is that whether there are the applicant’s liability of examining the documents and informing its discrepancies to the issuing bank or not, and if the applicant broke such a liabilities, it lost the right of claiming the repayment from issuing bank. Finally to say, such applicant’s liabilities only must be existed in case the documents arrived to the issuing bank was delivered to the applicant within the time of the documents examination according to u.c.p 500 Act 14, d. i. But if any the documents were delivered to applicant after time of the documents examination, the applicant had not such liabilities because eventhough after those time the applicant would have informed to the issuing bank the discrepancies of documents, the issuing bank couldn’t receive repayment of its paid proceeds of document from the negotiating bank. In the result after time of issuing bank’s examination of documents, it is considered that there’s no actual benefit to ask the applicant practice it’s liability. Therefore finally to say. I concluded that the Suprem Court’s judgement was much more reasonable. In the following, the judgements of the supreme court would be analysed more concretely, the basic reasons of the results be explained and the way of protecting such L/C transaction would be presented.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사건의 사례
Ⅲ. 법원판결내용 검토 및 문제점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 중국 전자기업 하이얼(Haier)의 글로벌화 사례연구
- A Study on the Identification between Shipowner and Charterer to Sue for the Liability of transportation: Focused on English and Canadian Common Law
- 국제전자결제시스템으로서 CHIPS에 관한 연구
- 유통서비스의 글로벌 시장적응력
- 동아시아 주요국의 FTZ화물관리 개선방안에 관한 비교연구
- Cultural Value Orientations of Selected Southeast Asian Countries
- 국내자동차부품업체의 해외시장조사방법별 성과에 관한 연구
- 온라인 구전의 정보방향과 평가내용이 구전효과에 미치는 영향
- 한국제조업의 대미 수출경쟁력 변화분석
- 한국 국가이미지와 기업이미지간의 상호효과에 대한 실증연구
- 한ㆍ중간 무역경쟁력 분석
- 남북한 육상물류 활성화를 위한 강원도 과제와 전략
- 신용장거래에 있어서 개설의뢰인의 서류심사 및 하자통지 의무
- 중국 가족기업의 경영승계 모형에 관한 연구
- EU 회원국 근로자들의 근무강도 및 작업환경이 직무만족에 미치는 영향
- 디지털콘텐츠 경제 상거래를 위한 유통 사이트 고객 수용도에 관한 연구
- 세이프가드협정하의 인과관계의 해석원칙에 관한 연구
- 일본 내 한류가 원산지효과에 미친 영향
- WTO 환경 하에서 국내 환율결정요인에 대한 실증분석
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 무역학분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 무역학분야 NEW
- 기술혁신형 중소기업에 대한 정부의 복합적 연구개발 지원 성과에 관한 연구
- A Study on Trade Credit Financing:Evidence from Chinese A-share Listed Companies
- 한국과 대만 상장기업의 ESG 활동이 경영 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!