학술논문
성과연봉제 가처분 사건의 법적 쟁점과 분석
이용수 124
- 영문명
- The Legal Issues and Analysis in Relation to the Case Regarding the Injunction on Incentive Based Salary
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김태현(Kim, Tae Hyun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第28卷 第2號, 213~243쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2017.12.30
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Upon the suggestion of the government to adopt the performancebased salary system in government agencies in February 2016, many government agencies have gone forward to amend the Rules of Employment to accommodate the changes through the resolution of the Board of Directors in direct opposition to the labor unions, and by June 2016, 120 government agencies have successfully adopted the performance-based salary system. Labor unions and workers have argued that the adoption of the performance-based salary system is an unfavorable change to the Rules of Employment and require the majority consent of the labor unions or workers. In this regard, the labor unions and workers have sought to annul the Rules of Employment and applied for injunctions over the newly amended Rules of Employment all around the country. We hereby discuss the legal issues surrounding this injunction case regarding performance-based salary.
(i) Regarding the Rules of Employment, there are legal opinions that state that this injunction case lacks any preservable rights citing the court decision that the object of the action for declaratory relief shall be a specific right or legal relationship, and one cannot submit an actin for declaratory relief seeking the annulment for any general or abstract laws or rules. However, should the Rules of Employment be amended due to performance-based salary, the actual salary that the workers are compensated for their work will change, thus we are of the opinion that this action has as its object a current and specific right and legal relationship. (ii) Whether performance-based salary is an unfavorable change to the Rules of Employment is a debatable issue that needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis. While the plus-sum method does not lower the actual wages and therefore don’t qualify as an unfavorable change, the zero-sum method would bring about the conflict between favorable and unfavorable change, thus making it an unfavorable change in the Rules of Employment. (iii) Regarding the collective consent method, recent court decisions have ruled in favor of the substantial protection, and thus have partially restricted the circulation and association method of consent forms that used be allowed under the law. This ruling is in line with the legislative intent behind Article 94 Paragraph 1 of the Labor Standard Act of Korea and is therefore applaudable. Nonetheless, the debate on how the discussion method will be compatible with collecting opinions will continue. (iv) If the adoption of the performance-based salary accompanies unfavorable change in the Rules of Employment, then according to the precedents up to date, socially accepted reasonableness would come into question. (v) There is also the question of standing of the workers in the action for declaratory relief, however, as the employer is obligated to pay wages to workers pursuant to the Rules of Employment one can argue that the workers positions is under clear and present danger, and even if taking into consideration the probability of filing for a lawsuit or litigation economics, we should accept that workers have standing in such cases. There is also the question of whether labor unions have standing considering that they only have indirect and factual relationship to the case, but once we take into account the fact that the majority consent of the labor union is mandatory according to Article 94 Paragraph 1 of the Labor Standard Act of Korea, at the least the majority of the labor union should be construed to have a specific and legal relationship. (iv) For injunctions the necessity for preservation of the rights is a issue that needs to be addressed, and should be determined strictly. It is also current practice to examine the necessity for preservation of the rights as an independent element and require high level evidence for its admission. However, considering the unique status of labor injunctions, one needs to be careful in directly appl
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 노동가처분의 특색
Ⅲ. 성과연봉제 가처분의 법적 쟁점과 사례분석
Ⅳ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 근로관계에서 사용자의 취업시킬 의무와 근로자의 휴식
- 시민참여 활성화를 위한 ‘정당법’ 개선에 관한 연구
- 성과연봉제 가처분 사건의 법적 쟁점과 분석
- 改正 親生推定制度에 대한 평가
- Legislative Systems based on the Chinese Constitution and Legislative Systems based on the Separation of powers
- 한국 상법의 총칙 및 상행위 편에서 나타나는 민법의 지위에 관한 소론
- 환경보호를 위한 국민신탁법과 자연환경국민신탁의 특징과 문제점에 관한 소고
- 사업주의 안전배려의무의 사정(射程)범위에 관한 소고
- 산업재해보상보험법상 구상권의 본질과 제3자로서의 공무원 -대법원 2003. 12. 26. 선고 2003다13307 판결을 중심으로-
- 자치경찰제 논의와 법정책적 소고
- 미국의 법관선거제도와 선거 연설 및 선거 기부에 관한 쟁점에 대한 논의
- 자연환경국민신탁정관
- 형법상 정당방위의 요건에 대한 비판적 이해
- 가상통화 생성방식에 따른 유형별 법적 규제방안 연구 -발행주체의 존재여부를 중심으로-
- 소비자정책 평가체계의 법적정비에 관한 연구
- 한·중 시장지배적지위 남용에 관한 비교연구
- ‘변호인의 조력을 받을 권리’에 관한 최신 쟁점
- 독일의 집단적 소송제도 최신 동향 -시범확인소송(Musterfeststellungsklage) 도입과 관련하여-
- 청원경찰제도에 대한 노동법적 재조명
- 중국의 도시부동산관리법의 이해
- 부당노동행위에 있어 지배·개입 의사에 관한 일고
- 일본에서의 과로자살 법리에 대한 소고
- 제조물책임법상 ‘개발위험의 항변’의 필요성 여부에 관한 소고
- 해외지급보증수수료의 이전가격과세에서 정상가격 산출방법의 위법성 판단 근거 및 실무상 운용의 문제점
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!