본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

한ㆍ중 동반자 작가 논쟁에 관한 비교 연구

이용수 198

영문명
A Comparative Study on the Fellow-traveler's debate in Korea and China
발행기관
한국언어문학회
저자명
소산산(Su Shan shan)
간행물 정보
『한국언어문학』韓國言語文學 第91輯, 235~258쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 한국어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.12.31
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

From the late 1920s until the early 1930s in Korean and Chinese literary world 'fellow-traveller' was mentioned as a topic for discussion and then the debate of fellow-traveller writer began. 'Fellow-travellers' Literature as a phraseology was first put forwarded by Leon Trotsky(1879-1940) who was a Marxist literary theorist in his book 'Literature and Revolution' published in 1923. After that through translation this phrase flooded into Korea and China. Trotsky defined that fellow-travellers were the writers who accepted revolution in their own ways, not the artists of proletarian revolution, but the art fellow-travellers of proletarian revolution. But the RAPP defined fellowtravellers' Literature as decadent, counter revolutionary literature and excluded them. In Korea the KAPF excluded the fellow-traveller writers who sympathized with KAPF's thought but did not become a member of KAPF. In China League of the left-wing writers fellow the Soviet definition and dealed with them as the counter revolutionaries. They put the fellow-traveller writers as unimportant existence of proletarian literature with the reason that it lacks in proletarian consciousness. The fellow-traveller writers and the proletarian literature group members all accepted the literature theories of Marxism but with a different trend. KAPF and League of the left-wing writers accepted Leninism advocated by Stalin which emphasized the partiality. The fellow-traveller writers accepted the literature theories of Marxism established by Plekhanov, Trotsky. The debates of fellow-traveller writer which happened in Korea and China were the conflict of opinions between who emphasized the partiality and who advocated the purity of literature. After the debates, the relationship between literature and politics was magnified but at the same time KAPF and League of the left-wing writers where breaching the basic principle of base and superstructure by emphasizing political tendency in creation of literature and ideological literary criticism. Instead, fellow-traveller writers who Expose social contradictions and connote the destruction of old society in an indirect way were the real Marxists.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 한국에서 '동반자'개념의 유입과 동반자 작가논쟁
3. 중국에서 '同路人'개념의 유입과 文藝自由論辯
4. 나가는 말
<참고문헌>
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

소산산(Su Shan shan). (2014).한ㆍ중 동반자 작가 논쟁에 관한 비교 연구. 한국언어문학, 91 , 235-258

MLA

소산산(Su Shan shan). "한ㆍ중 동반자 작가 논쟁에 관한 비교 연구." 한국언어문학, 91.(2014): 235-258

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제