전후비평의 타자화와 폐쇄적 권력지향성 - 1960～70년대 ‘문학과지성’ 에콜을 중심으로 -

• 영문명: The Othering of Criticism in Post-war Korea and Closed desiring for Power
• 발행기관: 한국문학회
• 저자명: 하상일(Ha Sang-Il)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국문학논총』제36집, 305~329쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2004.04.01

영문 초록

This thesis maintains on "Moonji", 1960～1970's and shows phases of authorization in Korean literary criticism. First of all, I Focused on Critics in 1960's, who organize "Moonji" and have a generational strategy to strengthen the meaning of literary history in criticism of 4.19 Generation through the way of the othering of criticism in post-war Korea. It is equal that the 1960's criticism is a result of distinguishing to 1950's criticism and devaluating to criticism in post-war Korea as an effort of generational recognition campaign. Next, I focused on the fact that founding of "Moonji" formed by transcribing the flow of the history of criticism after "the April's revolution"(4월혁명) and it was deepened concretely by the continual founding of a literary coterie magazines after the April's revolution. Especially, I revealed that the founding of "Moonji" is a result of distinguishing from "Changbi"(?창작과비평?) and the confrontation of the history of Korean criticism was deepened by arguing between purism and participation which performed by these two ecole Like this, The literary world of korea confronted and bisected thoroughly by these two ecole, "Moonji" and "Changbi". Of course, I couldn't say it wronged completely as these two ecole kept the standardizing of literary world and broadened the variation of literature. But it required to criticize and verify objectively whether the competitive excluvism of ecole, "Moonji" would be exhaust or not and the subjective criticism presented when they others the criticism in post-war Korea would be a self-contradiction or not by being a process of powering.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 4월혁명과 문학지형의 변화

Ⅲ. 『문학과지성』의 비평의식과 문학권력의 형성

Ⅳ. 맺음말

참고문헌