西浦 金萬重의 辭이론과 文彩이론의 비교 연구

• 영문명: A Parallel Study on Seopo 西浦's Theory of Sa 辭 and Figure
• 발행기관: 한국문학회
• 저자명: 김성언(Kim Seong-Eun)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국문학논총』제36집, 87~111쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2004.04.01

영문 초록

Kim, Man Jung(1637～1692) was a famous literary man in Joseon Dynasty, who wrote several novel by Korean letters and left a collection of own works named Seopo-jip 西浦集. He was also a distinguished literary critic, whose theory of protecting unique Korean literature has been largely supported by so many scholars of today. In this study, I notice his particular literary dichotomy which divided aspects of literature into Sa 辭 and Eui 意, as it were expression and meaning. This dichotomy is similar to the internal and external elements of literature argued by modern New Critics. Although his contemporary Confucian scholars made light the aspects of expression, he emphasized the importance of Sa. He contended that Sa was a substantial element of literature, and that it's true taste could not be obtained by translation. He thought the common people's labor songs was more genuine than the nobility's pedantic Chinese poetry, and linked with ridicule the latter to a speech of a parrot. I think that these views of literature correctly correspond the theory of figure. According to the theory of figure, it is a important equipment which set literature independent from subordinated position to philosophy or religion. And figure is a visual radiance which could not be gained by a free translation of meaning. It is a flesh of fruit, sweet flavor of art, not a chat of a parrot but a genuine human language. Even though both time and space are so different, Korean medieval literary man Kim, Man Jung and today Western theorist of literary figure have something in common. Both of them recognize the consequence of literary expressions, furthermore argue that only harmonious combination between meaning and expression can guarantee eternity of literature.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 辭에 관한 여러 가지 논의

Ⅲ. 西浦 ‘辭’의 여러 의미와 文彩論과의 비교

Ⅳ. 결어: 이상적 문학, 意와 辭의 변증법적 통일

참고문헌