들뢰즈를 어떻게 이용할 것인가 - 유목주의와 자율주의에 관한 몇 가지 문제제기

• 영문명: How to exploit Deleuze?
• 발행기관: 한국비평이론학회
• 저자명: 오길영(Gilyoung Oh)
• 간행물 정보: 『비평과 이론』제10권 제2호, 145~172쪽, 전체 28쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.12.01

영문 초록

This paper aims at delving into some couched issues in the reception of the Deleuzian theory(-machine) in the Korean context with the brand names of Nomadism and Autonomism. Rather than suggesting another theoretical engagement with the on-going discussions about which reading or interpretation of Deleuze being correct or not, this study purposes to explore the possibility and necessity of exploiting, following Deleuze's own terms, the Deleuzian theory-machine as "a box of tools," insofar theory is, as far as Deleuze is concerned, has to be useful and functioning. For this reason, it is required for us to construct some new theory-machines in the context of 'here-now' in Korea, instead of merely revising or impassionately commenting on the Deleuzian philosophy, which may, as Deleuze has pointedly advised, fall into the pitfall of a naive adoration of the given theory as the untouchable Bible. This paper is compartmentalized into three parts. The first part deals with the provocative but yet unresolved issues of how to receive, modify, and above all exploit not only the Deleuzian theory of becoming, but his elaborated post-modern or trans-modern politics of assemblage, (re)territorialization, de-territorialization, the line of flight, and the minor politics with other relevant notions. The second part elaborates on the question of what goes with the title of Autonomism in relation to such addressed issues as the minority politics, the alternative notion of 'empire' envisioned as substituting the 'the old-fashioned' notion of imperialism plus modern nation-state, and the politics of autonomy. Against these backdrops of the Deleuzian critique and reshuffle of the binary logics of the modern macro-politics and the post-modern micro-politics, this essay demonstrates the ways of how Deleuzian problematics tackling with this unfounded binary logic of the Western philosophy and politics, with a certain detailed examinations of the possibility of articulation and connection of the modern macro-politics and the post-modern micro-politics. With these issues in mind, I attempt to highlight such theoretical questions as how to construct a new relationship of mass and class, what to do in the long revolution of overcoming the couched difficulties in drawing the line of flight, and evading the simplified and naive logic of fancying itself as establishing some autonomous territory of a communist community. The last part of this paper addresses itself to a certain concerned literary questions in the relevance of the Deleuzian thinking on the discourse of literature. The last part of this study purposes to give some detailed explanations about the applicable (im)possibilities of the Deleuzian contributions to breaking up the aporia of modern aesthetics as typically exemplified in the presupposed problematics of representation, imitation, as well as to encouraging us to dwell on the potentiality of the trans-modern aesthetic as a form of newly envisioned 'sensibility' going beyond the above-mentioned modern terms of aesthetics.

목차

[1] 들어가며

[2] 유목주의와 자율주의: 들뢰즈 이론의 한국적 수용

[3] 자율주의와 소수정치

[4] 유목주의, 자율주의, 문학

[5] 결론에 대신하여: 이론-기계로 들뢰즈를 이용하기

인용문헌

Abstract