北京奥运体育仲裁的理论与实践

• 영문명: The Theory and Practice of the Beijing Olympic Games Sports Arbitration
• 발행기관: 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
• 저자명: 郭树 理(GUO Shu-li)
• 간행물 정보: 『스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법』제12권 제4호, 11~41쪽, 전체 31쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.11.30

국문 초록

由于通过诉讼途径解决体育纠纷存在种种困难，目前奥运会期间的体育纠纷都是由国际体育仲裁院（CAS）特别仲裁机构的快速仲裁机制解决的，2008年北京奥运会亦不例外。《奥林匹克宪章》第59条明确了CAS特别仲裁机构对奥运会期间体育纠纷的排他性管辖权，所有参加奥运会的运动员、教练员、裁判员所填写的参赛报名表中，都包含了接受CAS专属管辖权的强制性仲裁条款。北京奥运会CAS特别仲裁实践维护了体育法的一些基本原则，如禁止反言原则、保护运动员参赛权利原则、技术事项不予审查原则等。中国最高司法机关对CAS北京特别仲裁机制的运作明确表示了支持。

영문 초록

As the disadvantages in the litigation settlement of sports disputes, all the sports disputes arising from the Olympic Games now are settled by the special fast track arbitration mechanism of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Article 59 of the Olympic Charter provides the exclusive jurisdiction of the CAS Olympic Games ad hoc Division to the sports disputes during the Olympic Games, while all the athletes, trainers and referees need to sign an entrance form which includes a mandatory clause to accept the exclusive jurisdiction of CAS. The special sports arbitration practice in the Beijing Olympic Games upholds the general principles of sports law, such as the estoppel, protect of sports rights of athletes, non review of the technical issues, etc. The supreme judicial organ of China expressed its supports to the operation of the CAS Beijing Olympic Games ad hoc Division.

목차

Ⅰ、体育纠纷救济的诉讼与仲裁路径

Ⅱ、CAS奥运会特别仲裁机制的建立

Ⅲ、CAS北京奥运会特别仲裁实践对体育法基本原则的维护

Ⅳ、中国对CAS北京特别仲裁的保障

Ⅴ、结语

키워드

关 键 词 :奥 运 会 体 育 纠 纷 仲裁 管辖 权 pOlympic Games Sports Disputes Arbitration Jurisdiction