본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

미성년 자녀의 불법행위에 대한 비양육친의 감독의무

이용수 13

영문명
Non-custodial parent's duty to supervise torts of minor children: Focusing on a critical review of Supreme Court Decision 2020Da240021 Decided April 14, 2022
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
김판기 정현수
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第34卷 第2號, 265~288쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2023.12.31
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

When one of the parents is designated as the person with parental authority and caregiver, it is a question of whether the parent who does not have the duty to supervise the minor children can be recognized as a supervisor for torts of the minor children. Recently, the Supreme Court determined that non-custodial parents are not obligated to supervise torts of minor children unless there are special circumstances. The ruling set the first precedent on the issue of non-custodial parental supervision of minor children. However, the judgment of the lower court ruled that non-custodial parents are obligated to supervise minor children in principle, suggesting the opposite conclusion of the target judgment. There may be sufficient reasons for the differences in opinions between the first and second judgments and the Supreme Court judgments on the same facts. Even with the same facts, the interpretation may vary depending on how to interpret and link the legal principles of responsibility for supervisors under the tort law and the legal principles related to rights and obligations between parents and children under the kinship law. In this paper, we reviewed whether non-custodial parents can also recognize the supervisory duty in relation to the responsibility of supervisors for torts committed by minor children based on the tort law and the kinship law. And based on this review, we considered what interpretation theory would be a harmonious and more reasonable interpretation under civil law to present issues such as the subject judgment. The authors' views in this study are as follows - ① Non-custodial parents are also responsible for torts of the minor children, as non-custodial parents are also responsible for supervisory duties on minor children. ② However, if special circumstances are recognized, such as when a father or mother abandons a child who is an infant or loses contact after adopting him or her at home and abroad, or when decades have passed without interview negotiations or child support payments, non-custodial parents can be exempted from supervisory responsibility if they prove these special circumstances. This interpretation can be expected to increase the protection of victims due to torts and to remind underage children of their responsibilities and obligations as parents of normal growth and character formation. It is frequently reported in the media that civil and criminal problems related to minor children are occurring. Few would deny that there are inherent rights and obligations between parents and children. Based on these rights and obligations, it is believed that parents should bear some kind of infinite responsibility for their underage children to help them grow properly. Therefore, it is thought that this aspect will be fully considered in the interpretation of the law will be effective in preventing and solving social problems and reducing social costs.

목차

Ⅰ. 사실관계
Ⅱ. 법원의 판단
Ⅲ. 평석

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김판기,정현수. (2023).미성년 자녀의 불법행위에 대한 비양육친의 감독의무. 법학연구, 34 (2), 265-288

MLA

김판기,정현수. "미성년 자녀의 불법행위에 대한 비양육친의 감독의무." 법학연구, 34.2(2023): 265-288

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제