학술논문
行政訴訟改革と環境訴訟
이용수 152
- 영문명
- Administrative Litigation Reform and Environmental Litigation
- 발행기관
- 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 山田 洋(Hiroshi Yamada)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논총』제30권 제1호, 177~187쪽, 전체 11쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.04.30
4,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The latest version of Japan’s Administrative Case Litigation Act was passed in 2004, after 40 years of maintaining almost the whole original version, which has been aimed at entitling citizens to satisfy their needs more efficiently in environmental disputes. This report has been focused on analyzing and evaluating the current and possible influence of the revision on such litigations, and on clarifying and presenting upcoming tasks in this field.
The most typical in such environmental disputes are cases in which cancellations of development or installation permission are sought by inhabitants around the planned sites. In such litigations, the most troublesome obstruction lies in the restriction of the third party standing to sue, which was long denied in precedents on the ground that the third parties could not seen as representing particular individual interests besides public interest. In the light of the 2004revision, however, with its newly added article 9 clause 2, some new interpretation has been introduced to sustain the third party standing according to their actual damages. The Supreme Court itself, in the litigation against administrative approval for installing an overhead railway, has shown a new ruling to approve nearby inhabitants’ standings. Alike trend can also be observed in the litigation against future permission to reclaim land from the seashore, which has been made possible by the new provision of prohibitory injunction. Such is one of the great progresses brought by the 2004 revision, in that citizens are able to raise litigation in beforehand not having to wait until cancellation appeal is deemed ripe.
In order to prevent further environmental destruction, in addition to the above remedies, it should be provided for citizens to demand Administration to suspend ongoing public constructions. There had not been a path for such appeal traditionally, however, for the Act was not equipped with litigation to impose Administration a duty. Now that the revised Act has both types of mandatory appellate litigation to demand permission towards a plaintiff and to demand order towards a third party, illegal buildings are being litigated by nearby inhabitants to be corrected on administrative order.
There also exist other kinds of administrative action than disposition, including plan and guidance. Newer types of litigation, therefore, against such kinds should be sought in the future, so that citizens can be ensured their rights to declaratory judgment etc. when plan or guidance is illegally pursued. Today, we can find dispositions in the 2004 revised Act which show prospect in such expected direction.
목차
一、はじめに
二、取消訴訟の活性化
三、差止め訴訟の法定
四、義務付け訴訟の活用
五、訴訟形式の柔軟化
六、むすびにかえて
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 하자담보책임의 고찰과 입법적 제언
- 글로벌 환경문제 대책의 곤경과 해법
- 한국에서 내린 중재판정에 대한 중국법원의 승인 및 집행에 관한 소고(小考)
- 行政訴訟改革と環境訴訟
- 한국의 경제위기와 노동법의 역할
- 횡령죄와 배임죄의 관계
- 배임죄구성요건의 문제점과 전망
- 일본에서의 「토양오염대책법」의 법적평가
- 公众参与 : 中国环境法的民主化、法治化课题
- 재산범죄와 형법상 재물의 개념
- 법인세법상 접대비 관련 규정의 해석
- 기능식 청구항의 해석 및 거절방법에 관한 고찰
- 한국에 있어서 집중심리방식의 현황
- Probleme und Perspektiven des Untreuetatbestandes
- 자비로 완화된 정의
- 韓国における経済危機と労働法の役割
- 應對全球性环境問題的困境与出路
- 형법 제334조 제1항 ‘야간주거침입강도죄’의 실행착수 시기
- 행정소송개혁과 환경소송
- 소유자의 절도범으로부터의 자기 소유물 탈환과 자구행위
- 4대강 정비사업에 따른 법적 쟁점
- 배임죄에서 재산상 손해발생의 위험
- 日本における土壤汚染對策法の法的評価
- A Brief Analysis on the Recognition and Enforcement in Chinese Courts of Korea Related (Republic of) Arbitral Awards Made in Korea and Other Contracting States of the 1958 New York Convention
- 중국법의 변화와 방향
- 공공참여 : 중국 환경법의 민주화와 법치화 과제
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!