다자이 오사무(太宰治)의 『남녀동권(男女同權)』과안톤 체호프의 『담배의 해독에 관하여』와의 비교연구

• 영문명: A Comparative Study between Dazai Osamu 『The Same Rights of Men and Women』 and Anton Checkhov 『On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco』 -On the Emphasis of "Laughter"-
• 발행기관: 일본어문학회
• 저자명: 이은희(Lee Eun Hee 李恩姬)
• 간행물 정보: 『일본어문학』日本語文學 第71輯, 419~440쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 일본어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.11.30

영문 초록

This study has investigated how 'laughter' is described in what pattern and feature by accepting Chekhov deriving creation through 'laughter,' based on the analysis of similarities and differences of two works. When it comes to its similarities, it has explored natures of the reflector, and deviation whose lecture is against the title. Particularly, an old poet in 『The Same Rights of Men and Women』and Hornh in 『On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco』are portrayed based on a technique of a caricature by approaching readers softly not seriously despite its tragic situations. In this process, it reveals that the laughter spread due to deviation of contents of the lecture is connected to a theory of discordance. Secondly, targets for satire and its characteristics have been analysed to reveal the differences. 『The Same Rights of Men and Women』 shows backbiting or criticism of women because its motif is based on social background right after the defeat, and intention of criticism on the literary world. On the contrary, Hornh in 『On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco』 is described as a representative as a Russian henpecked husband in the 19th century, who has to do what his wife forces him to do to live. In this context, 『On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco』 more deals with similarities of the lives of the characters by being objected as lives of audience, and provides pleasant laughter without aggression by giving the audience a chance of observing themselves. On the other hand, criticism on women in 『The Same Rights of Men and Women』 is more portrayed as a target of satire towards the outside of the literary world or society, so it shows aggressive laughter as ridicule. 本稿では笑いを通じて、創作を引き出す、チェホフを収容し、「笑」という手法がどのような様相と性格に描かれているかを両作品の類似点と相違点を並べて調べた。類似点では視点人物の特性、講演が本タイトルから反する逸脱を重点的に調べてきた。『男女同權』の老詩人と『煙草の害について』のニューヒンはテキストの状況は明らかに悲劇的であるが、これが読者に深刻ではない、むしろ軽く近付く戯画化の技法で描かれている。この過程で講演内容の逸脱に拡大されて笑いが描かれていることを不一致の理論で明らかにした。異なる要素では風刺の対象と性格について概観した。『男女同権』は、敗戦直後の社会的な背景と文壇批判の意図が底辺に敷かれ、これが登場する女性たちの悪口や批判的に表している。 異なる要素では風刺の対象と性格について概観した。『煙草の害につい て』のニュヒンは妻がさせることなら何でもしなければ生活できない19世紀ロシアパン、恐妻家を代表する人物として描かれている。このような脈絡で『煙草の害について』では観客の生活に対象化され、登場人物の人生と類似している点について観客自身に自らを観察する機会を提供したが、攻撃性がない愉快な性格の笑いである。一方、『男女同権』の女性批判は風刺の対象に文壇や社会など外部に向かって嘲弄という攻撃的な笑いが描かれている。

목차

要旨

1. 서론

2. 다자이의 체호프 수용

3. 희화화(戯画化)와 불일치의 웃음

4. 풍자의 웃음

5. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

웃음. 아이러니. 패러독스 풍자 서술자 희화화 유머 Laughter Irony Paradox Satire Narrator Travesty Humor 笑い アイロニー パラドックス 風刺 語り手 戯 画 化 ユー モア