본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

방사면역측정법과 화학발광면역측정법간의 숙련도 비교평가

이용수 0

영문명
The Evaluation of Proficiency Test between Radioimmunoassay and Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
발행기관
대한핵의학기술학회
저자명
노경운(Gyeong Woon Noh) 김태훈(Tae Hoon Kim) 김지영(Ji young Kim) 김현주(Hyun Joo Kim) 이호영(Ho Young Lee) 최준영(Joon Young Choi) 이병일(Byoeng Il Lee) 최재걸(Jae Gol Choe) 이동수(Dong Soo Lee)
간행물 정보
『핵의학기술』Vol.15 No.2, 116~124쪽, 전체 9쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 방사선과학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.11.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Purpose: To establish accurate external quality assurance (EQA) test, cross institutional and modality tests were performed using WHO certificated reference material (CRM) and same pooled patients serum. Materials and Methods: Accuracy and precision were evaluated using CRM and pooled patients' serum for AFP, CEA, PSA, CA 125, CA 19-9, T3, T4, Tg, TSH. To evaluate the accuracy and precision, recover test and coefficient variation were measured. RIA test were performed in major 5 RIA laboratory and EIA (CLIA) test were done in 5 major EIA laboratory. same sample of CRM and pooled serum were delivered to each laboratory. Results: In 2009, mean precision of total tumor marker of RIA was 14.8±4.2% and that of EIA(CLIA) was 19.2±6.9%. In 2010, mean precision of 5 tumor marker and T3, T4, Tg, TSH was 13.8±6.1% in RIA and 15.5±7.7% in EIA (CLIA). There was no significant difference between RIA and EIA. In RIA, the coefficient variations (CV) of AFP, CEA, PSA, CA 125, T3, T4, TSH were within 20%. The CV of CA 19-9 was over 20% but there was no significant difference with EIA (CLIA) (p=0.345). In recovery test using CRM, AFP, PSA, T4, TSH showed 92~103% of recovery in RIA. In recovery test using commercial material, CEA, CA 125, CA 19-9 showed relatively lower recovery than CRM but there was no significant difference between RIA and EIA (CLIA). Conclusion: By evaluating the precision and accuracy of each test, EQA test could more accurately measured the quality of each test and performance of laboratory.

목차

서론
대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
요약
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

노경운(Gyeong Woon Noh),김태훈(Tae Hoon Kim),김지영(Ji young Kim),김현주(Hyun Joo Kim),이호영(Ho Young Lee),최준영(Joon Young Choi),이병일(Byoeng Il Lee),최재걸(Jae Gol Choe),이동수(Dong Soo Lee). (2011).방사면역측정법과 화학발광면역측정법간의 숙련도 비교평가. 핵의학기술, 15 (2), 116-124

MLA

노경운(Gyeong Woon Noh),김태훈(Tae Hoon Kim),김지영(Ji young Kim),김현주(Hyun Joo Kim),이호영(Ho Young Lee),최준영(Joon Young Choi),이병일(Byoeng Il Lee),최재걸(Jae Gol Choe),이동수(Dong Soo Lee). "방사면역측정법과 화학발광면역측정법간의 숙련도 비교평가." 핵의학기술, 15.2(2011): 116-124

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제