정적 영상에서 Noise Reduction Software의 이해와 적용

• 영문명: The Understanding and Application of Noise Reduction Software in Static Images
• 발행기관: 대한핵의학기술학회
• 저자명: 이형진(Hyung Jin Lee) 송호준(Ho Jun Song) 승종민(Jong Min Seung) 최진욱(Jin Wook Choi) 김진의(Jin Eui Kim) 김현주(Hyun Joo Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『핵의학기술』Vol.14 No.1, 54~60쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 방사선과학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.06.30

영문 초록

Purpose: Nuclear medicine manufacturers provide various softwares which shorten imaging time using their own image processing techniques such as UlatraSPECT, ASTONISH, Flash3D, Evolution, and nSPEED. Seoul National University Hospital has introduced softwares from Siemens and Philips, but it was still hard to understand algorithm difference between those two softwares. Thus, the purpose of this study was to figure out the difference of two softwares in planar images and research the possibility of application to images produced with high energy isotopes. Materials and Methods: First, a phantom study was performed to understand the difference of softwares in static studies. Various amounts of count were acquired and the images were analyzed quantitatively after application of PIXON, Siemens and ASTONISH, Philips, respectively. Then, we applied them to some applicable static studies and searched for merits and demerits. And also, they have been applied to images produced with high energy isotopes. Finally, A blind test was conducted by nuclear medicine doctors except phantom images. Results: There was nearly no difference between pre and post processing image with PIXON for FWHM test using capillary source whereas ASTONISH was improved. But, both of standard deviation(SD) and variance were decreased for PIXON while ASTONISH was highly increased. And in background variability comparison test using IEC phantom, PIXON has been decreased over all while ASTONISH has shown to be somewhat increased. Contrast ratio in each spheres has also been increased for both methods. For image scale, window width has been increased for 4~5 times after processing with PIXON while ASTONISH showed nearly no difference. After phantom test analysis, ASTONISH seemed to be applicable for some studies which needs quantitative analysis or high contrast, and PIXON seemed to be applicable for insufficient counts studies or long time studies. Conclusion: Quantitative values used for usual analysis were generally improved after application of the two softwares, however it seems that it’s hard to maintain the consistency for all of nuclear medicine studies because result images can not be the same due to the difference of algorithm characteristic rather than the difference of gamma cameras. And also, it’s hard to expect high image quality with the time shortening method such as whole body scan. But it will be possible to apply to static studies considering the algorithm characteristic or we can expect a change of image quality through application to high energy isotope images.

목차

서론

실험재료 및 방법

결과

결론 및 고찰

요약

REFERENCES

키워드

Noise Reduction Software PIXON ASTONISH