본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

수사목적 불심검문 사안(事案)의 판단 법리

이용수 51

영문명
A study on the grounds for court’s ruling in trials about investigative stop and frisk
발행기관
한국형사판례연구회
저자명
조인현(Cho, In-Hyun)
간행물 정보
『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제27권, 411~455쪽, 전체 45쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2019.06.30
8,200

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This study examines what it is like to be the Court’s Ruling about investigative stop and frisk. In this article I discussed also the differences between the provisions of the Korean Stop and Frisk and that of the other countries such as U.S.A., Germany and Japan. The police officer used to stop and frisk for purposes of investigation when the circumstances justify suspicion but fall short of probable cause. The suspected might be arrested only if there was something close to probable cause for the police officer to believe that he had committed an offense. However, criminal trials has been required to exclude illegally obtained evidence from investigative stop and frisk. According to the Court’s Ruling, any investigation, having been taken place before recognition process, could be considered as a part of the investigation scope. The investigative stop might be regarded as investigative activities. There, the excessive violation of human rights should be strictly forbidden. As a result, the more neutral scrutiny of a judge might be required in trials about investigative stop. Therefore the rule of law doctrine has to be respected as follows. Firstly, the rights of the people shouldn’t be restricted excessively to maintain safety and order of public, but the fundamental human rights must be protected. Secondly, the privacy and freedom of people are citizen’s privilege to enjoy his social lives. Thus no citizens shall not be unfairly or illegally violated by the police power. Lastly, We must always keep attention to protect the rights of the people in those investigative activities from being unfairly infringed by the police authority.

목차

[대상판례]
[연구]
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 불심검문 제도 연혁 및 입법례
Ⅲ. 대상판례의 수사목적 불심검문 허용 범위 연구
Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

조인현(Cho, In-Hyun). (2019).수사목적 불심검문 사안(事案)의 판단 법리. 형사판례연구, 27 (1), 411-455

MLA

조인현(Cho, In-Hyun). "수사목적 불심검문 사안(事案)의 판단 법리." 형사판례연구, 27.1(2019): 411-455

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제