횡령죄의 보관관계

• 영문명: Custody of the Embezzlement: Penal law and Principle of good faith
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 김대휘(Kim, Dae-Hwi)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제27권, 329~345쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.06.30

영문 초록

In case the bond transferor collects the bonds from the debtor and receives the money before the transfer notice, the question is whether criminal punishment in charge of the embezzlement for such a double default, which is morally reprehensible, conforms to the criminal justice. About this problem, there was a tense 8:5 split in the Supreme Court’s opinion, which would verify the proposition of critical legal positivism that what is just is difficult to agree on.

목차

[대상판결] 대법원 1999. 4. 15. 선고 97도666 전원합의체 판결

[연구]

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기 —비판적 법실증주의

Ⅱ. 법원리 적용의 한계

Ⅲ. 결어 —평석

키워드

횡령죄 보관관계 법원리 신의성실의 원칙 비판적 법실증주의 Embezzlement Custody Legal Principle Principle of good faith Critical Legal Positivism