『시의 원리』와 『시학평전』에 나타난 ‘동양’과 ‘순수’ 인식의 비교

• 영문명: Comparison of ‘Oriental and ‘pure perception in 『The Principles of Poetry』 and 『The Critical Biography of Poetic』
• 발행기관: 한국언어문학회
• 저자명: 이병주(Lee ByeongJu)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국언어문학』韓國言語文學 第115輯, 167~196쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2020.12.30

영문 초록

This paper aims to look at the perceptions of ‘Oriental’ and ‘Pure’ in Cho-Jihoon s ‘The Principles of Poetry’ and Song-wook s ‘The Critical Biography of Poetic’. Cho Ji-hoon s ‘Oriental’ was called in the process of raising Korean literature to a position equal to that of Chinese literature. On the other hand, Song-wook recognizes the ‘Oriental’ to be a critical ability that synthesizes nature, society, politics, and religion. Song-wook criticizes writers who have not adequately embraced his version of ‘Oriental’, and demands the expansion of Korean literature traditon to Europe. The perception ‘pure’ that Jo Ji-hoon believes is purity in literary topics and “implicative life(함축적 생명) Songwook critisized Jo Ji-hoon’s view as ‘artificial’ language. In the case of Songwook recognized ‘Pure’ as “a new sentence based on oral language spoken by ordinary people” according to “history, sociality and experience” suggested by Elliott’s view of language

목차

1. 서론

2. 『시의 원리』와 『시학평전』의 지향

3. 동양과 한국의 동일시와 오인된 동양비판

4. 제재로서의 순수와 사회반영의 순수

5. 결론

키워드

조지훈 시의 원리 송욱 시학 평전 동양 순수 Cho-Jihoon the principles of poetry Song-wook the critical biography of poetic korean poetic theory Oriental Pure