학술논문
친생추정의 법리와 혈연 진정성
이용수 198
- 영문명
- Legal Principle about Presumption of Paternity and Veracity of Blood Tie
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 차선자(Cha, Seonja)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』家族法硏究 第33卷 2號, 1~42쪽, 전체 42쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2019.07.30
7,840원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
From the traditional society to the enactment of Korean Civil Law there are two legal bases to regulate filiation to somebody. The first is blood tie based on its veracity and the second is adoption. However, at that time
the veracity of blood tie could have never been clearly confirmed, because of lacking of advancement in scientific technology. For this reason a child born after two hundred days from the day when the marriage was formed or within three hundred days from the day when the marital relationship is terminated is presumed to have been conceived
during the marriage(Art. 844 of Korean Civil Law). This presumption could be eliminated only by the action of denial of paternity within two years from the day when he or she becomes aware of the cause of the action(Art. 847. Ⅰ).
However, it might be too strict for the husband whose legal child has not blood tie with him, if he could eliminate his paternity only by the action of denial of paternity. Because from the viewpoint of the plaintiffship and period, the action of denial of paternity has very strict conditions. Namely, the action could be filed only by a legal father or
mother and within short period of 2 years after getting to know that a legal child has not biological tie with him.
For this reason, Korean Supreme Court has permitted the denial of paternity through action demanding confirmation of denial of paternity(Art. 865) for husband, by which the plaintiffship is accepted for any persons who have legal interest in confirming of paternity and the period filing the action is not limited, when it was very clear that the wife could not become pregnant for instance because of lacking living together. However, recently technological development like artificial reproduction and DNA test makes it much easier confirm the veracity of biological tie. It brings a question if the exception of the presumption of the husband’s paternity for the child shall be enlarged not only in case of
lacking living together but also in the event of husband’s impossibility of reproduction or of child’s genetic mismatch with the legal father.
From the critical aspect, firstly this paper examines which theory to decide legal paternity is the most effective in AID procedure for the best interest of a child. Secondly, it reviews the necessity and justification about magnifying exception of the presumption of husband’s paternity for a child are reviewed. Thirdly, it verifies which influence gives rise to the action of denial of paternity and action demanding confirmation of denial of paternity, when the exception of the presumption of husband’s paternity is magnified. Lastly which provisions shall be revised to guarantee the right to know the veracity about blood tie of a child and biological father.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 사건 내용 및 원심의 판단
Ⅲ. AID에 동의한 夫의 부자관계형성과 부성부인
Ⅳ. 친생추정에 관한 제844조의 적용과 예외
Ⅴ. 나가며: 친자법의 과제
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 相続法改正の概要
- 의견서 ―대법원 2016므0000 친생자관계부존재확인―
- 의견서 ―대법원 2016므0000 친생자관계부존재확인―
- 부자관계의 결정기준: 혼인과 혈연
- 2018년 일본 상속법 개정의 개요
- 일본 개정 유류분 제도의 내용과 시사점
- 피해아동보호명령 실무 ―개요와 현황을 중심으로―
- 친생자 추정 논의에 관한 법학방법론적 문제
- 독일과 프랑스 조약상의 선택적 부가이익공동제 ―독일민법과의 비교를 중심으로―
- 친생추정의 법리와 혈연 진정성
- 相続法改正の課題と展望
- 상속회복청구권의 제척기간 ―법률해석, 헌법적 평가, 개선입법―
- 영국 2002년 입양 및 아동법(Adoption and Children Act 2002)에 관한 소고
- 의견서 ―대법원 2016므0000 친생자관계부존재확인―
- 피해아동의 분리 보호와 친권의 제한
- 의견서 ―‘2016므0000 친생자관계부존재확인’ 사건 관련―
- 독일에서의 부부재산계약의 내용통제
- 외국에서의 대리모출산과 친자관계 결정의 문제에 대한 소고 ―독일과 우리나라의 판례의 동향을 중심으로―
- 상속법 개정의 과제와 전망 ―가족의 다양화와 고령사회에 대한 대응의 관점에서―
- 가족법 주석서의 典範(Ⅱ) ―『주해상속법』(全 2권, 박영사, 2019)에 대한 서평―
- 家族法硏究 第33卷 2 號 목차
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!