학술논문
한국에서 온라인서비스제공자의 법적 책임론이 나아갈 방향
이용수 66
- 영문명
- The Proper Direction for the OSP’s Liability Rule in Korea
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 박준석(Park, Jun-Seok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제43권 제3호, 9~49쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.09.30
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The legal theory or regulation on the secondary liability of Online Service Provider is roughly divided into two parts, liability requirement and liability limitation requirement. For the OSPs’ liability requirement portion, Korean court seems to have taken unified position in both users’ copyright infringement case and defamation case, pointing out that Joint Tort-feasors rule in Article 760, Clause 3 of the Korean Civil Act is the statutory ground for OSPs liability requirement. For the liability limitation portion, meanwhile, there has been inconsistency of liability limitation requirement in
Korean Copyright Act and The Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Data Protection, thereby making OSPs in Korea suffer from unnecessary legal uncertainty. OSPs’ secondary liability rules in Korea should not follow the US model in which it has been traditionally divided between copyright infringement and defamation. Korea has not differentiated copyright infringement case from other infringement cases including defamation in the secondary liability requirement portion, whereas US has done. Moreover, it can’t be missed that there is a plausible argument for the unification of OSPs’ liability limitation rules even in US.
Therefore, OSPs’ secondary liability rules in Korea should be unified over all infringement areas by users, regardless of copyright infringement, defamation, etc., to settle the legal uncertainty in Korea, mentioned above. While the best way would be a new unified law on OSPs’ secondary liability limitation, if it would be severely hard, the second best way to do so is to make immediate amendments harmonizing OSPs’ liability limitation clauses in both acts, Korean Copyright Act, Article 102 &103 and the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network
Utilization and Data Protection, Article 44-2. It’s a wrong conception at least in OSPs’ secondary liability area, the way of thinking that defamation cases related to the freedom of speech should be treated differently from copyright infringement cases at all times. In addition, the following differences just can be merely secondary
considerations, but never make it very hard to unify OSPs’ secondary liability rules; i)online defamation is usually done through Bulletin Board System rather than Peer to Peer network which has been one of main devices for online copyright infringement, ii) it’s harder in online defamation case to judge the legality of the information at issue and control illegal information than in online copyright infringement case, iii) there is a relatively stronger need to identify direct infringers in online defamation than in online copyright infringement because the former case has relatively fewer infringers than the latter and only the former case has irreparable harm which can’t be compensated by monetary remedies.
목차
l. 서론
ll. 온라인서비스제공자 책임론의 변화 연혁
lll. 온라인서비스제공자의 책임 관련규정의 통합필요성
lV. 온라인서비스상 저작권침해사건과 명예훼손사건의 차이점들의 고려문제
V. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- L’AMELIORATION DE LA LEGISLATION ET DE LA REGLEMENTATION
- 关于中韩双边贸易协定的思考
- 한․중 국제경제법학회 국제학술회의 참관기
- 中国海外能源合作所引起的法律问题思考
- 한국에서 온라인서비스제공자의 법적 책임론이 나아갈 방향
- 동북아 지역협력체를 통한 원자력 발전소 건설의 전망과 과제
- 헌법재판소 결정에 나타난 인터넷에서의 표현의 자유
- 동업기업 과세특례상 현물출자 및 노무출자의 구분과 과세상의 쟁점
- 코포레이트 거버넌스 이론의 국내도입과 그 한계에 관한 연구
- 피고인의 구속사유에 관한 고찰
- ‘상인에 대한 약관’의 규제에 관한 독일약관법규정의 고찰과 우리 약관규제법의 개정문제
- 试论中国《反垄断法》上的适用除外制度
- 근로자의 직무발명과 정당한 보상에 관한 연구
- 从严格禁止到有节制的宽容:规制董事关联交易的制度演进
- 最高人民法院与合同生效要件
- 中国对外商投资能源产业的规制及展望
- 입양의 효력이 있는 허위의 친생자출생신고에 대한 친생자관계부존재확인청구
- 论中国能源产业法律及其制度创新
- 派生金融商品課稅에 있어서 稅務行政問題
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!