학술논문
피고인의 구속사유에 관한 고찰
이용수 62
- 영문명
- A Study of a Requisite for the Detention of the Defendant in the Current Code of Criminal Procedure
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 정진섭(Jung, Jin-Sup)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제43권 제3호, 239~266쪽, 전체 28쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.09.30
6,160원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Section 70 of the current Criminal Trial Act (Act) defines the basis of an detention of a defendant. The purpose of a detention of the defendant, after arrest, is to secure the defendant’s appearance in court and to eliminate any possibility of evidence tampering by the defendant. This also means when the defendant is found guilty, he or she is available for the enforcement of a penalty rendered by the court.
While this section pertains to the detention of a defendant, Clauses 1 & 3 of the Section are also applicable when enforcement agencies deal with suspects and have them in custody (Section 201, Clause 1). Thus, the Section can be said to be the general rules for an arrest and detention.
The defendant is protected by the “innocent until proven guilty” theory under the Constitution (Section 27, Clause 4) and the Act (Section 275, Clause 2). The defendant should not be treated any differently from an ordinary citizen and any special circumstances should be dealt with in accordance with the relevant laws.
Clause 1 of Section 1 defines the elements of an arrest as an existence of suspicion and the reason for an detention as concern of evidence tampering and escape. Meanwhile, Clause 2 deals with issues to consider when examining a
detention (seriousness of the crime, repeating offence, safety of the plaintiff), whereas Clause 3 defines special rules for minor crimes. Clause 2 was newly added into the Act as the amendment on June 1st, 2007.
The Section, together with the legalism on compulsory execution and obtaining a warrant (Section 201 & 215 of the Act), is a basic rule for human rights and fairness in the legal procedures of a trial, as well as in pre-trial stages through systematic operation.
Therefore, any detention made during the investigation stage should have its legal basis in Section 70 of the Act, where the elements to be considered in a detention have been defined (uncertain residential status, concern of evidence tampering, escape, chances of escape). In addition, the amendment of the Act, as of June 1st2007,
which defines issues to consider for an detention, such as seriousness of the crime, possibility of a repeated offence, safety concern of the plaintiff or a witness, may all be grounds for varied improvement on this very issue.
With the new amendment, and based on the criticism that the court lacked the ability to find a legal basis for an arrest and detention, more objective and concrete precedents are hoped to be established from this point on.
목차
l. 서언 - 형사소송법 제70조의 취지
ll. 피고인 구속의 주체
lll. 피고인 구속의 요건
lV. 구속사유의 심사기준 내지 고려사항
V. 결어
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- L’AMELIORATION DE LA LEGISLATION ET DE LA REGLEMENTATION
- 关于中韩双边贸易协定的思考
- 한․중 국제경제법학회 국제학술회의 참관기
- 中国海外能源合作所引起的法律问题思考
- 한국에서 온라인서비스제공자의 법적 책임론이 나아갈 방향
- 동북아 지역협력체를 통한 원자력 발전소 건설의 전망과 과제
- 헌법재판소 결정에 나타난 인터넷에서의 표현의 자유
- 동업기업 과세특례상 현물출자 및 노무출자의 구분과 과세상의 쟁점
- 코포레이트 거버넌스 이론의 국내도입과 그 한계에 관한 연구
- 피고인의 구속사유에 관한 고찰
- ‘상인에 대한 약관’의 규제에 관한 독일약관법규정의 고찰과 우리 약관규제법의 개정문제
- 试论中国《反垄断法》上的适用除外制度
- 근로자의 직무발명과 정당한 보상에 관한 연구
- 从严格禁止到有节制的宽容:规制董事关联交易的制度演进
- 最高人民法院与合同生效要件
- 中国对外商投资能源产业的规制及展望
- 입양의 효력이 있는 허위의 친생자출생신고에 대한 친생자관계부존재확인청구
- 论中国能源产业法律及其制度创新
- 派生金融商品課稅에 있어서 稅務行政問題
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!