본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

공정거래위원회의 전속고발권 존폐론의 검토

이용수 363

영문명
A Review of the Exclusive Right of Complaint of the Fair Trade Commission
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
최정학(Choi, Cheong-Hak)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제23권 제3호, 311~335쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.03.01
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(‘FTA’) provides that “Any offense in violation of Articles 66 and 67 shall be prosecuted through public action only after a complaint is filed by the Fair Trade Commission(‘FTC’).” This exclusive right of complaint, however, has resulted in the scarce prosecution and punishment of corporate crime and the lack of the protection of the private consumers. Therefore, it has been asserted that the exclusive complaint right should be abolished and a discrete investigation of the prosecutor’s office and a private person’s voluntary complaint should be allowed. This essay reviews the assertion of abolition and the opposite defense. The main points of the argument are following two comparisons. First, the violations of the FTA have been almost wholly processed by FTC. This exclusive responsibility had been established from the high speciality of the commission and the efficiency of only one-line procedure. However, as the economic condition has changed and much more crimes has occured, the process should be divided into two-folds, that is, to the prosecutor’s office for the ‘crime’. Second, the private suit of a compensation for damages, as an alternative of the criminal process, has some defects for an enough protection of consumers. They have to prove the illegality and causality of the deeds and are at a disadvantage of legal resources compared to the ‘Big Companies’. Therefore, in conclusion, this essay argues that the exclusive complaint right of the FTC should be abolished. Unlike the opposite argument, the abolishment would not result in the urgent increase the criminal process. On the contrary, the prosecutor’s office could make an adequate decision as the FTC not to have too strong impact to the economy. Moreover, the companies would be more cautious to avoid the prosecution and punishment and the consumers could restore themselves more easily with the help of the criminal process.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 공정거래위원회의 고발 통계
Ⅲ. 전속고발권 폐지에 관한 주장들
Ⅳ. 쟁점의 검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

최정학(Choi, Cheong-Hak). (2011).공정거래위원회의 전속고발권 존폐론의 검토. 형사법연구, 23 (3), 311-335

MLA

최정학(Choi, Cheong-Hak). "공정거래위원회의 전속고발권 존폐론의 검토." 형사법연구, 23.3(2011): 311-335

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제