학술논문
적법절차를 따르지 아니하고 수집한 압수물의 증거능력 - 대판 2007. 11. 15, 2007도3061(전원합의체판결) 공직선거법위반
이용수 515
- 영문명
- Admissibility of the evidence illegally obtained against due process
- 발행기관
- 한국형사법학회
- 저자명
- 윤종행(Yoon Jong-Haeng)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제19권 제4호, 329~354쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.01.22
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Lately, Korean criminal procedure code was revised and the exclusionary rule is written frankly on it(§308-2). Korean Supreme Court enlarged the scope of the application of the exclusionary rule to the degree of German or American judicial system as Korean legal scholars have insisted for long time.
Supreme Court ordered the Appellate Court to review whether there was violation of due process in the course of search and seizure as the defendant insists. Korean Supreme Court also declared that according to constitutional specifications of due process, illegally seized evidence is not allowable as evidence in criminal trials. It means that the exclusionary rule can be applicable to the defendant"s belongings illegally seized by the police.
The Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine which excludes from introduction at trial any evidence eventually developed as a result of an originally illegal search or seizure was approved by the court. Simultaneously, Supreme Court leaves the space of the exceptional modification of the exclusionary rule based upon the weight of the violation of due process, the reasonal mistakes of the officers, etc.
I strongly believe that the exclusionary rule should be observed strictly to deter illegal seizure and search. Also the decision allowing the exception of the rule has to be made scrupulously. I would suggest other criteria are included in them, such as the degree of the crime omitted by defendant and seriousness of the legal interests trespassed by the illegal seizure and search.
Supreme Court ordered the Appellate Court to review whether there was violation of due process in the course of search and seizure as the defendant insists. Korean Supreme Court also declared that according to constitutional specifications of due process, illegally seized evidence is not allowable as evidence in criminal trials. It means that the exclusionary rule can be applicable to the defendant"s belongings illegally seized by the police.
The Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine which excludes from introduction at trial any evidence eventually developed as a result of an originally illegal search or seizure was approved by the court. Simultaneously, Supreme Court leaves the space of the exceptional modification of the exclusionary rule based upon the weight of the violation of due process, the reasonal mistakes of the officers, etc.
I strongly believe that the exclusionary rule should be observed strictly to deter illegal seizure and search. Also the decision allowing the exception of the rule has to be made scrupulously. I would suggest other criteria are included in them, such as the degree of the crime omitted by defendant and seriousness of the legal interests trespassed by the illegal seizure and search.
목차
[판결 이유의 요지]
[별개의견]
[연구]
〈Abstract〉
[별개의견]
[연구]
〈Abstract〉
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 안락사의 정당화 구조 - 형법철학의 측면에서
- 성매매특별법의 실효성
- 개정 형사소송법상 인신구속제도에 관한 고찰
- 개정 형사소송법상 전문증거(傳聞證據)의 증거가치에 대한 검토
- 전자기록 부정행사의 형사책임
- 개정 형사소송법과 수임판사의 재판에 대한 불복
- 개정 형사소송법상의 증거조사
- 변호인의 피의자신문참여권
- 우리나라에서의 국제형법의 전망과 과제 - 국제형사규범의 국내법원을 통한 국내적 이행을 중심으로
- 편집후기
- 무고죄의 허위사실에 관한 연구
- 개정 형사소송법 제308조의2 위법수집증거배제법칙의 법적 의미와 적용범위
- ‘반인권적 국가범죄의 공소시효 배제 등에 관한 특례법안(의안번호 제7478호)’에 대한 의견서
- 적법절차를 따르지 아니하고 수집한 압수물의 증거능력 - 대판 2007. 11. 15, 2007도3061(전원합의체판결) 공직선거법위반
- 개정 형사소송법상 재정신청제도에 대한 비판적 검토
- 한국형사법학회 회칙 외
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!