학술논문
무고죄의 허위사실에 관한 연구
이용수 326
- 영문명
- A Study on the false information in the crimes of false accusation
- 발행기관
- 한국형사법학회
- 저자명
- 이존걸(Lee John-Girl)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제19권 제4호, 285~302쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.01.22
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study investigated on the false information in the crimes of false accusation. The results of the study are follows;
First, the crimes of false accusation is the case of report of the false information to a public office and an official for the purpose of having a criminal and disciplinary punishment imposed upon another. The false information in the crimes of false accusation is against objective truth. Thus, a person who lodged complaint is not contrary to law if the report was the objective truth, although this person thought that the report to an investigation and a disciplinary authority was a false information. The reason of the person being not contrary to law is that there is no law to punish the attempted crime in the crimes of false accusation although the act of the report is an attempted crime.
Second, whether the report is false or not is determined by the fact that the heart of the report is the objective truth. There are a case of partial false of the report, a case of false on the name of the crime or legal appreciation and a case of false on mis-indication of person who will be punished.
Third, there are two aspects on the range of the expression of the false information. Both aspects equally pointed out that the range of the expression of the false information should be within the ranges of pursuing an investigation by an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. It is only a difference by abstract or concrete in the expression. One of the reason of the punishment on the crimes of false accusation is that this act interfere the duties of an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. Thus, In order to be the crimes of false accusation by an act, the expression of the false information should be within the range of pursuing an investigation on the false information by an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. However, it is not significant if the expression is abstract or concrete.
Fourth, the criteria of the determination on whether the reported contents are false are the false of information, but not the truth of the content.
First, the crimes of false accusation is the case of report of the false information to a public office and an official for the purpose of having a criminal and disciplinary punishment imposed upon another. The false information in the crimes of false accusation is against objective truth. Thus, a person who lodged complaint is not contrary to law if the report was the objective truth, although this person thought that the report to an investigation and a disciplinary authority was a false information. The reason of the person being not contrary to law is that there is no law to punish the attempted crime in the crimes of false accusation although the act of the report is an attempted crime.
Second, whether the report is false or not is determined by the fact that the heart of the report is the objective truth. There are a case of partial false of the report, a case of false on the name of the crime or legal appreciation and a case of false on mis-indication of person who will be punished.
Third, there are two aspects on the range of the expression of the false information. Both aspects equally pointed out that the range of the expression of the false information should be within the ranges of pursuing an investigation by an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. It is only a difference by abstract or concrete in the expression. One of the reason of the punishment on the crimes of false accusation is that this act interfere the duties of an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. Thus, In order to be the crimes of false accusation by an act, the expression of the false information should be within the range of pursuing an investigation on the false information by an investigation and a disciplinary authorities. However, it is not significant if the expression is abstract or concrete.
Fourth, the criteria of the determination on whether the reported contents are false are the false of information, but not the truth of the content.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 虛僞事實의 意義
Ⅲ. 虛僞事實의 類型
Ⅳ. 虛僞事實의 摘示程度와 認定基準
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 虛僞事實의 意義
Ⅲ. 虛僞事實의 類型
Ⅳ. 虛僞事實의 摘示程度와 認定基準
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
〈Abstract〉
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 안락사의 정당화 구조 - 형법철학의 측면에서
- 성매매특별법의 실효성
- 개정 형사소송법상 인신구속제도에 관한 고찰
- 개정 형사소송법상 전문증거(傳聞證據)의 증거가치에 대한 검토
- 전자기록 부정행사의 형사책임
- 개정 형사소송법과 수임판사의 재판에 대한 불복
- 개정 형사소송법상의 증거조사
- 변호인의 피의자신문참여권
- 우리나라에서의 국제형법의 전망과 과제 - 국제형사규범의 국내법원을 통한 국내적 이행을 중심으로
- 편집후기
- 무고죄의 허위사실에 관한 연구
- 개정 형사소송법 제308조의2 위법수집증거배제법칙의 법적 의미와 적용범위
- ‘반인권적 국가범죄의 공소시효 배제 등에 관한 특례법안(의안번호 제7478호)’에 대한 의견서
- 적법절차를 따르지 아니하고 수집한 압수물의 증거능력 - 대판 2007. 11. 15, 2007도3061(전원합의체판결) 공직선거법위반
- 개정 형사소송법상 재정신청제도에 대한 비판적 검토
- 한국형사법학회 회칙 외
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!