학술논문
信託法上 受益者의 信託違反 處分行爲 取消權
이용수 54
- 영문명
- A beneficiary’s right of rescission under the Trust Act
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 李根瑩(Lee Keun-Young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第2號, 287~319쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.10.01
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
(1) The purpose of this study is to analyze a beneficiary"s right of rescission under the Trust Act §52.
According to the Trust Act §52, the beneficiary can rescind a trustee"s dispositions of the trust property when the trustee has committed a breech of trust of main object. And the beneficiary can do restoring of the trust property.
But, the effects of his rescission have binding power to not only the trustee(transferor) but also a transferee(the third person) and a new transferee who has dealt with former transferee. So it is, what is called, a peculiar system in trust.
Because of this uniqueness, it will inflict a unexpected damage on the third person, who has deal with trustee, that the beneficiary exercises his this right. So the section 52 stipulates the many requirements.
The trustee"s dispositions caused the breech of trust of main object is especially important requirements. And they mean the trustee"s dispositions out of his power.
Especially the breech of the "duty to exercise reasonable care and skill" and "duty of loyalty" will become at issue in the various breech of trustee"s duties.
(2) The control of interests between the beneficiary and the third person is one of the most important subjects. And the beneficiary can rescind the trustee"s dispositions of the trust property when the trustee has committed the breech of trust of main object in the Trust Act §52.
But there are some problems about this subject in the existing theory. One theory explains that §52 for the control of interests is a policy clause without theoretical explanation. The others explain it regardless the nature of interests of the beneficiaries.
Therefore, to solve these problem, it is considered that the necessary of study to the construtive trust in the Restatement(2nd) of Trust §288.
According to the Trust Act §52, the beneficiary can rescind a trustee"s dispositions of the trust property when the trustee has committed a breech of trust of main object. And the beneficiary can do restoring of the trust property.
But, the effects of his rescission have binding power to not only the trustee(transferor) but also a transferee(the third person) and a new transferee who has dealt with former transferee. So it is, what is called, a peculiar system in trust.
Because of this uniqueness, it will inflict a unexpected damage on the third person, who has deal with trustee, that the beneficiary exercises his this right. So the section 52 stipulates the many requirements.
The trustee"s dispositions caused the breech of trust of main object is especially important requirements. And they mean the trustee"s dispositions out of his power.
Especially the breech of the "duty to exercise reasonable care and skill" and "duty of loyalty" will become at issue in the various breech of trustee"s duties.
(2) The control of interests between the beneficiary and the third person is one of the most important subjects. And the beneficiary can rescind the trustee"s dispositions of the trust property when the trustee has committed the breech of trust of main object in the Trust Act §52.
But there are some problems about this subject in the existing theory. One theory explains that §52 for the control of interests is a policy clause without theoretical explanation. The others explain it regardless the nature of interests of the beneficiaries.
Therefore, to solve these problem, it is considered that the necessary of study to the construtive trust in the Restatement(2nd) of Trust §288.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 취소권발생의 요건
Ⅲ. 취소권 행사
Ⅳ. 처분행위 취소의 효과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 취소권발생의 요건
Ⅲ. 취소권 행사
Ⅳ. 처분행위 취소의 효과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 지적재산권의 간접침해와 남용이론 - 지적재산권 간접침해영역의 확대경향에 대한 남용이론의 도입필요성을 중심으로
- 高齡化社會에 비추어 본 行爲無能力制度의 문제점과 後見制度의 擴張
- 失踪宣告 取消의 效果에 대하여 - 실종선고 후 그 취소전 잔존배우자의 재혼을 중심으로
- 효과적인 내부통제 체제 구축을 위한 입법적 과제
- 감사위원회제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 建物의 合倂과 合體의 法律關係
- 자산유동화의 대상자산의 확대
- 인체 세포에 대한 법적 권리
- 信託法上 受益者의 信託違反 處分行爲 取消權
- 법정담보물권이라는 개념의 유용성의 한계 - 대법원 2005. 10. 13. 선고 2004다26799 판결을 계기로
- 문서제출명령 발령절차와 제출명령위반의 효과
- 예방법학적 분쟁해결방법의 필요성에 대한 고찰
- 일본민법학의 계수가 부당한 경우 및 그 시정방안
- 假押留 後에 설정된 抵當權의 優先辨濟的 效力
- 병원의 결함의약품의 제조와 사용으로 인한 제조물책임 - EuGH, Urt. v. 10. 5. 2001 - Rs. C - 203/99의 국내법적 검토
- 眺望權에 대한 小考
- 附錄
- 쌍무계약의 청산에 있어서 급부의 반환 법리 - 원상회복과 부당이득 법리를 중심으로
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!