본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

쌍무계약의 청산에 있어서 급부의 반환 법리 - 원상회복과 부당이득 법리를 중심으로

이용수 186

영문명
A Study of the Rendition in Case of Clearing off of a Bilateral Contract -Centered on Retrieval and Unfair Profit -
발행기관
한국재산법학회
저자명
鄭震明(Chung Jin-Myung)
간행물 정보
『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第2號, 221~255쪽, 전체 35쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2006.10.01
7,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  The most important normative laws in clearing of a bilateral contract are two which are a claim of retrieval by rescission and a claim for rendition of unfair profit by legal flaw of cause. Korean civil law, in the case of contract expiration by invalidity or cancellation, there has no regulation against the legal means for clearance but applies the law of unfair profit. Clearing off by rescission can"t help depending on this law because it regulates retrieval as a duty at the time of rescission of a bilateral contract. Therefore, this causes arguments about what the duty of rendition by rescission gets the legal quality. The theory of direct effect which is major argument and precedent regard the retrieve as unfair profit that comes from contract expiration by rescission.
  However, counter-arguments against these major argument and precedent are presented with two ways. One is the opinion that negates contract expiration by rescission and then considers that original contract should be turned into clearing off. It considers retrieve as a special rescission. The other pinion, which adapts German civil law concerned with the explanation on the form of unfair profit, thinks that retrieval for rendition of benefit and rescission by invalidity or cancellation of a bilateral contract is the system for contract clearing and then considers that the effects of the two parties should be dealt with simultaneously. Therefore, the issue about what principle to follow for rendition of benefit should be considered for the case of clearing of a bilateral contract.
  In this paper, the relationship between a claim for retrieval by rescission and rendition of benefit by unfair benefit, which has based on rendition of benefit having been fulfilled, were examined first. And then, this paper researched what principle contra benefit in rescission of a bilateral contract should be dealt with.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 쌍무계약의 청산 법리
Ⅲ. 해제와 원상회복
Ⅳ. 부당이득유형론과 원상회복
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

鄭震明(Chung Jin-Myung). (2006).쌍무계약의 청산에 있어서 급부의 반환 법리 - 원상회복과 부당이득 법리를 중심으로. 재산법연구, 23 (2), 221-255

MLA

鄭震明(Chung Jin-Myung). "쌍무계약의 청산에 있어서 급부의 반환 법리 - 원상회복과 부당이득 법리를 중심으로." 재산법연구, 23.2(2006): 221-255

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제