학술논문
失踪宣告 取消의 效果에 대하여 - 실종선고 후 그 취소전 잔존배우자의 재혼을 중심으로
이용수 79
- 영문명
- A Consideration regarding the Effect of revoking Adjudication of Disappearance - Concerning the remarriage of the remained spouse after adjudicate the disappearance and before cancel it -
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 南潤鳳(Nam Yoon-Bong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第2號, 77~97쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.10.01
5,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Article 29 of the Korean Civil Law provides that the court, according to the request of the person him/herself or the persons interested, must revoke adjudication of disappearance, if it is proved that a missing person is alive. However, it states that the revocation shall not prejudice the effect of an action in good faith conducte from the day of adjudication of disappearance
up to the time of revocation.
Although this provision, however, is in accord with the basic principle of protecting the right of a third party acting in good faith, it goes against the rules that the intention of an actor him/herself should be absolutely respected in legal action regarding the laws of domestic relations and inheritance. Accordingly, in the case that the living spouse of a missing person with adjudication of disappearance, knowing the missing spouse is in fact alive, marry again another person after the adjudication, the second marriage will become null and void if the court revokes the adjudication of disappearance because the living spouse is ill-intentioned. In that case, the living spouse"s real intention of remarriage will not be sufficiently protected. Consequently, the rules that the intention of an actor him/herself should be absolutely respected in legal action regarding the laws of domestic relations and inheritance will be easily violated.
In order to correct this error, I suggest the current article 29 of the Civil Law be revised as follows,
ⅰ) Paragraph 2 should newly provide that "Even if the adjudication of disappearance is revoked, the marital relations remain annulment. However, it shall not prejudice the effect of an action regarding the law of property in good faith conducted from the day of adjudication of disappearance up to the time of revocation," and
ⅱ) Current paragraph 2 should be changed to paragraph 3.
In conclusion, if so, the legal confusion will be in advance prevented as well as legal repugnance between the general provisions and the law of domestic relations in civil code can be solved.
up to the time of revocation.
Although this provision, however, is in accord with the basic principle of protecting the right of a third party acting in good faith, it goes against the rules that the intention of an actor him/herself should be absolutely respected in legal action regarding the laws of domestic relations and inheritance. Accordingly, in the case that the living spouse of a missing person with adjudication of disappearance, knowing the missing spouse is in fact alive, marry again another person after the adjudication, the second marriage will become null and void if the court revokes the adjudication of disappearance because the living spouse is ill-intentioned. In that case, the living spouse"s real intention of remarriage will not be sufficiently protected. Consequently, the rules that the intention of an actor him/herself should be absolutely respected in legal action regarding the laws of domestic relations and inheritance will be easily violated.
In order to correct this error, I suggest the current article 29 of the Civil Law be revised as follows,
ⅰ) Paragraph 2 should newly provide that "Even if the adjudication of disappearance is revoked, the marital relations remain annulment. However, it shall not prejudice the effect of an action regarding the law of property in good faith conducted from the day of adjudication of disappearance up to the time of revocation," and
ⅱ) Current paragraph 2 should be changed to paragraph 3.
In conclusion, if so, the legal confusion will be in advance prevented as well as legal repugnance between the general provisions and the law of domestic relations in civil code can be solved.
목차
Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. 家族法的 身分行爲의 法的取扱
Ⅲ. 現行 民法上 失踪宣告 取消의 效果
Ⅳ. 殘存配偶者의 惡意의 再婚問題
Ⅴ. 民法 제29조의 改正案 提示
Ⅵ. 結語
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 家族法的 身分行爲의 法的取扱
Ⅲ. 現行 民法上 失踪宣告 取消의 效果
Ⅳ. 殘存配偶者의 惡意의 再婚問題
Ⅴ. 民法 제29조의 改正案 提示
Ⅵ. 結語
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
실종선고
실종선고 취소의 효과
실종자
생존배우자
선의ㆍ악의
가족적 신분
재혼
재산관계
본인의사
본인의사절대원칙
법의 일반원칙
선의자 보호
법개정안
법리의 모순
민법 제29조
adjudication of disappearance
revocation of adjudication of disappearance
missing person
living spouse
good-intentionㆍill-intention
family identity
remarriage
relationship of property
legal action regarding the laws of domestic relations and inheritance
intention of an actor him/herself
revision
protection of children
contradiction of principle of law
article 29 of the Korean Civil Law
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 지적재산권의 간접침해와 남용이론 - 지적재산권 간접침해영역의 확대경향에 대한 남용이론의 도입필요성을 중심으로
- 高齡化社會에 비추어 본 行爲無能力制度의 문제점과 後見制度의 擴張
- 失踪宣告 取消의 效果에 대하여 - 실종선고 후 그 취소전 잔존배우자의 재혼을 중심으로
- 효과적인 내부통제 체제 구축을 위한 입법적 과제
- 감사위원회제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 建物의 合倂과 合體의 法律關係
- 자산유동화의 대상자산의 확대
- 인체 세포에 대한 법적 권리
- 信託法上 受益者의 信託違反 處分行爲 取消權
- 법정담보물권이라는 개념의 유용성의 한계 - 대법원 2005. 10. 13. 선고 2004다26799 판결을 계기로
- 문서제출명령 발령절차와 제출명령위반의 효과
- 예방법학적 분쟁해결방법의 필요성에 대한 고찰
- 일본민법학의 계수가 부당한 경우 및 그 시정방안
- 假押留 後에 설정된 抵當權의 優先辨濟的 效力
- 병원의 결함의약품의 제조와 사용으로 인한 제조물책임 - EuGH, Urt. v. 10. 5. 2001 - Rs. C - 203/99의 국내법적 검토
- 眺望權에 대한 小考
- 附錄
- 쌍무계약의 청산에 있어서 급부의 반환 법리 - 원상회복과 부당이득 법리를 중심으로
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!