본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

듀이 교육목적론 다시 읽기

이용수 383

영문명
Re-reading Dewey's theory of the educational aim
발행기관
한국교육철학회
저자명
김민남(Kim Min-Nam)
간행물 정보
『교육철학』교육철학 27집, 15~35쪽, 전체 21쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2005.08.01
5,320

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This article has a general goal, to re-read and re-consider Dewey's theory of the educational aim and to re-establish our own theory of education in this society with the help of Dewey's implication. Every step toward the goal must make us come to concretely assert as follows. : any adult generation, who should feel deep pity for uncomfortable lives young generations are confronted with, cannot state the aim of education as making a good citizen or proper supplement of human resources, with education confined to one of national functions. The author adopts a methodology to re-read Dewey, which can be expressed as 'there are just activities which search for something educational', instead of 'education exists'. That new expression comes from Dewey's definite recognition of human limits, who implied new theory of education should be made on positive reconstruction of human experience. The methodology is put by the author into the following proposition, "it is not only pedagogy but also the educational activity to establish in itself the educational aim", which can be thought to manifest Dewey's view of the world, "only intelligence exists." As stated, Dewey's expression, 'searching for something educational', surely provides the significant frame of reference to re-establishing our own theory of education composed of 10 elements as follows. : world view, theory of aim, theory of living, theory of learning, theory of inquiry, theory of experience, theory of society, theory of teacher, theory of power, and the adequacy of things educational. The author suggests our own theory of education should be described as 'a kind of ascetic self-discipline through reciprocal(dialectic) penetration', which can more fully include Korean values in education, such as teacher's commitment to doing his job, parents' devotion to cultivating their children, and everybody's desire to become a man of competence. Loads of things unsolved and unarticulated remain ahead of us in order to firmly build our own theory of education.

목차

Ⅰ. 듀이 교육론을 읽는 ‘방법론’
Ⅱ. 목적 정립의 지성, 표현법
Ⅲ. 유의미성을 산출하는 표현법 : 시간의 문제
Ⅳ. 맺음
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김민남(Kim Min-Nam). (2005).듀이 교육목적론 다시 읽기. 교육철학, 27 , 15-35

MLA

김민남(Kim Min-Nam). "듀이 교육목적론 다시 읽기." 교육철학, 27.(2005): 15-35

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제