모바일 단체대화방에서의 대화와 공연성

• 영문명: Conversation in mobile group chat rooms and its publicity
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 한제희(Han, Je– Hee)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제25권, 257~283쪽, 전체 27쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.06.30

영문 초록

The Supreme Court recognizes that if there is a possibility of propagating both defamation and insult, it is public. Whether or not a conversation in mobile or internet group chat rooms where only two or only a few participants are affected is a libel, it is also important whether the publicity is recognized by the possibility of propagation. The theory of propagation is still a meaningful theory. This is because, in order for publicity to be recognized, an indefinite or large number of people must not actually exist in a crime scene. In addition, defamation or insult by writing on the internet or mobile are far more dominant compared to defamation or insult by speech, and the application of the theory of propagation is beneficial. In the case of defamation or insulting an unspecified person, admitting the theory of propagation does not lead to unreasonable results when compared with the recognition of publicity by only a minority. In the case of insults, it is possible to spread the expression in a way that can not just be a mere contemptuous expression but also deteriorate the external evaluation of the victim. The theory of propagation that has been firmly supported by decades of decades has been criticized for freedom of expression, but it is not inevitably wrong. Because it can be relieved in accordance with Article 310 and Article 20 of the Criminal Code for matters that may unduly undermine freedom of expression.

목차

[대상판결 1] 대법원 2008. 2. 14. 선고 2007도8155 판결

[대상판결 2] 서울서부지방법원 2016. 3. 24. 선고 2015노1522 판결(대법원 2016. 8. 29. 선고 2016도4699 판결로 확정)

[연구]

Ⅰ. 뒷담화는 처벌되어야 하는가

Ⅱ. 공연성 요건은 왜 필요한가

Ⅲ. 전파가능성 이론은 타당한가

Ⅳ. 대상판결 사안의 검토

Ⅴ. 그래도 실패한 뒷담화는 처벌되어야 한다.

키워드

명예훼손 모욕 공연성 전파가능성 단체대화방 defamation insult publicity theory of propagation group chat room