학술논문
형법 제1조 제2항에 관한 판례 소고
이용수 70
- 영문명
- A Study on the Cases under Paragraph 2 of Article 1 of Criminal Act
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 신만성(Shin, Man-Sung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제42권 제2호, 373~398쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
There have necessarily been changes in acts, ordinances, regulations, bulletins, and guidelines according to social changes. These overall changes in statutes give rise to the problems of diversities in deciding whether the committer should be punished or not.
We can classify the occasions of changes in statutes into three groups: when the new statutes, having not been effective at the time when an act was committed, are established; when the statutes at the time when an act was
committed are abolished; when the statutes at the time when an act was committed are changed, and accordingly the gravity of punishment is changed.
Although previous crimes were not punishable under old statutes but are punishable under new statutes when the new statutes, having not been effective at the time when an act was committed, are established, it is a natural consequence that the committer should not be punished by the ex post facto law according to the Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege Praevia; Change of Precedent and Non-retroactivity Principle and the principle of the statutes at the time when an act was committed as contents of Grundsatz nulla poem sine lege”
When the statutes at the time when an act was committed are abolished, it seems natural that the committers should not be punished because no more legal ground for punishment exists. Nonetheless if the statute was already abolished, there are the occasions when the committers should be punished, that is, the occasions of proactive effect of the abolished statutes. This problem relates just to the proactive effect of the temporary statutes.
When the statutes at the time when an act was committed is changed and accordingly the gravity of punishment is changed, one should be punished under the new statutes which is lessened in punishment compared to old statutes
according to lex posterior derogat priori (Criminal Act Paragraph 2 of Article 1).
As above, in relation with the temporal scope of the criminal law, the problem arises whether the statutes at the time when the trial is held or the statutes at the time when an act was committed should be applied when the criminal law is changed in the period between both of them.
The paragraph 1 of article 1 of Criminal Act proclaims the principle of the statutes at the time when an act was committed or old statutes providing The constitution and punishment of a crime shall be in accord with the statutes at the time when it was committed , while the paragraph 2 declares exceptionally the principle of the statutes at the time when the trial is held or new statutes providing When an act does not constitute a crime or the punishment for it comes to be lighter than old statutes following the change of statutes after committment of the crime, they shall be in accord with the statutes at the time when a trial takes place.
On the proactive effect of the temporary statutes, there are competing theories such as positive stance, negative stance, and compromising stance by motive. Our Supreme Court, taking the compromising stance, admits the proactive effect when the statutes were changed in accordance with the facts, but rejects the proactive
effect when the statutes were changed in accordance with the legal opinions.
As I showed above, since the criteria for the distinction whether a case is relevant to the change in facts or to the change in legal opinions are ambiguous, I think it is reasonable that the admission of the proactive effect should be
clarified by means of establishing the interim provisions. Otherwise it should be denied according to Grundsatz nulla poem sine lege.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 형법 제1조 제2항과 限時法과의 관계
Ⅲ. 형법 제1조 제2항에 관한 판례 검토
Ⅳ. 관련문제
Ⅴ. 결 어
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 상법개정안상의 교부금합병에 대하여
- 형법 제1조 제2항에 관한 판례 소고
- 특정승계(特定承繼)
- 취재의 자유와 언론의 取材源接近權 논의
- 설명의무의 법적지위
- 과실불법의 요소인 주의의무의 성격과 기준
- 저작권 보호기간 연장에 관한 검토
- 국제범죄수사의 효율성 제고방안
- 쿠키(cookies)의 법적문제
- 중국에서 국제물품매매협약의 준거법 지정에 관한 고찰
- 국가기간상호간의 권한쟁의심판절차에서의 국회의원의 당사자능력과 제3자소송담당
- 주요 약관심결례의 쟁점 분석
- 현행 부당노동행위법에 대한 일고찰
- Privacy Issues and Public Opinion in Korea
- 국민투표에 관한 헌법적 고찰
- 법적 허구와 실체
- 韓美 公訴時效制度 比較硏究
- 청소년범죄의 형사법적 대책과 검사의 역할
- 인터넷상거래에 있어서의 소비자보호
- 任意競賣節次의 配當에 관한 몇 가지 爭點
- 주식회사 내부자의 자기거래에 관한 연구
- 물권의 특징 및 관련 판례 검토
- 뇌사와 장기이식의 형법적 문제
- 파산관재인의 법적 지위에 관한 고찰
- 「가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률」의 제문제
- 북한에서의 국제법의 국내법적 지위 및 효력에 관한 소고
- 金錢과 金錢債權의 特質
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!