학술논문
취재의 자유와 언론의 取材源接近權 논의
이용수 28
- 영문명
- Discussion on the Freedom of Newsgathering and the Mass Media s Right of Access - Its Possibility and Limitation -
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 노동일(Noh, Dong-Ill)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제42권 제2호, 247~274쪽, 전체 28쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
6,160원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The government, under the order of President Roh Moo-Hyun, started in late May plans to shut down press clubs run by government agencies and ministries, and consolidate briefing rooms. Government s so-called Media Support Modernization Plan sparked controversies among journalists, scholars, politicians and lawyers. Especially
journalists strongly objected to the attempt, maintaining that the government s plan would likely infringe on the freedom of the press protected by the Constitution.
The government, however, pushed forward with its plan regardless of the resistance from the media organizations and journalist associations. The lawyers for citizens, a civic group comprised of lawyers, filed on the 10th of July, 2007 a constitutional complaint against the government in the Constitutional Court of Korea. The petitioners included Munhwa Ilbo, a newspaper company, several reporters working for it, and some ordinary citizen readers.
The lawyers for citizens, on behalf of the petitioners, alleged in the complaint that the government s plan would infringe on the constitutional rights of the petitioners, including, freedom of reporting, freedom of newsgathering, right to
know, freedom of occupation, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to examine whether the mass media s right of access can be recognized and established as an element of freedom of newsgathering under the Korean Constitution, since the government s plan, if executed in original form, will affect the media s right of access to the sources of information most seriously.
This paper first has discussed the historical background of the mass media s right of access, from the case of Gannett Co., Inc. v. DePasquale to Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia and Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court(I, II). The United States Supreme Court has established two prong test, experience and logic
test or history and function test ever since Mr. Justice Brennan formulated them in Richmond Newspapers. The test has been adopted in numerous cases to evaluate whether the media s right of access can be established under the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution and is infringed by the government s action.
Article 21 of the Korean Constitution guarantees the freedom of the speech and press. Most of the scholars agree that this provision also guarantees the freedom of newsgathering as an element of the freedom of mass media. Although several scholars have discussed the media s right of access, it is not clear whether it can be recognized and established under the Korean Constitution.
Therefore, this paper has suggested that the media s right of access to the sources of information should be recognized and established under as a part of the freedom of the press under the Korean Constitution. The rationales supporting this argument are that the right of access to the sources of information is essential for
the freedom of the press and the media exercises this right as a surrogate of the general public.
It is not clear yet whether the Constitutional Court will adopt the right of access argument and two prong test to evaluate the constitutionality of the government s plan. However, it is highly desirable that the media s right of access and the test for it should be discussed among scholars and lawyers. I would like to expect this paper will serve to stimulate discussions over the possibility and limitations of the right of access issues before and after the decision of the Constitutional Court regarding this matter.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 언론의 취재원접근권에 관한 미국의 논의 현황
Ⅲ. 취재의 자유 및 취재원접근권에 관한 국내의 논의 현황
Ⅳ. 언론의 취재원접근권에 대한 제언
Ⅴ. 결 론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 상법개정안상의 교부금합병에 대하여
- 형법 제1조 제2항에 관한 판례 소고
- 특정승계(特定承繼)
- 취재의 자유와 언론의 取材源接近權 논의
- 설명의무의 법적지위
- 과실불법의 요소인 주의의무의 성격과 기준
- 저작권 보호기간 연장에 관한 검토
- 국제범죄수사의 효율성 제고방안
- 쿠키(cookies)의 법적문제
- 중국에서 국제물품매매협약의 준거법 지정에 관한 고찰
- 국가기간상호간의 권한쟁의심판절차에서의 국회의원의 당사자능력과 제3자소송담당
- 주요 약관심결례의 쟁점 분석
- 현행 부당노동행위법에 대한 일고찰
- Privacy Issues and Public Opinion in Korea
- 국민투표에 관한 헌법적 고찰
- 법적 허구와 실체
- 韓美 公訴時效制度 比較硏究
- 청소년범죄의 형사법적 대책과 검사의 역할
- 인터넷상거래에 있어서의 소비자보호
- 任意競賣節次의 配當에 관한 몇 가지 爭點
- 주식회사 내부자의 자기거래에 관한 연구
- 물권의 특징 및 관련 판례 검토
- 뇌사와 장기이식의 형법적 문제
- 파산관재인의 법적 지위에 관한 고찰
- 「가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률」의 제문제
- 북한에서의 국제법의 국내법적 지위 및 효력에 관한 소고
- 金錢과 金錢債權의 特質
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!