지역경제성과의 분석 ; 1988 - 1989

• 영문명: Indicators of Comparative Regional Economic Performance in Korea ; 1988 - 1989
• 발행기관: 한국지역개발학회
• 저자명: 홍기용(Hong KiYong) 강명훈(Kang MyungHun)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국지역개발학회지』제5권 제1호, 79~91쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 지역개발
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1993.06.30

영문 초록

The Purpose of this study, is to identify and evaluate the economic performance of various regions except for Seoul during 1988-1989 by using regional gross products data from the Ministry of Domestic Affairs. Various research methods such ogive, entropy index and multiple regression are employed to meet the research objectives. The major finding are as follows ; 1. The big-sized urban regions including metropolitan expect Seoul, Pusan and Daegu areas produces 57 percent of national gross production(GNP), followed by the medium-sized areas with 22 percent and the small-sized regions with 20 percent. 2. The regional industrial specialization is well under-performed through local resources in Korea. The food industry tends to concentrate in small-sized region while the textile and metal industries in the medium-sized regions. The big-sized regions has the highest specialization index in high technology and chemical industries. 3. The productivity in manufacturing industry is twice as much as any other industries and five times more than agriculturc and fisheries. And rural regions shows the highest labor pro ductivity over whole industries and the big-sized urban regions have the lowest labor productivity. In fact, the small-sized urban regions have the highest labor productivity, but the big-sized urban regions show the lowest. 4. The industrial specialization index given by ogive and entropy measures shows that the small-sized regions perform well in the process of industrial diversification and the big-sized urban regions perform relatively less. 5. The regression analysis by using regional production function statistically fit well in most research models. The research results reveals that the regional congestion costs will increase by growth in amount of agriculture and fisheries production over any other industries and decrease in space utility by the industries. This means that the congestion costs and space utility of industry location are important factors to increase absolute amount of production.