학술논문
민․상법의 통일적 법제도의 정비를 위한 조건
이용수 218
- 영문명
- Legal Approach to the Unification of Civil and Mercantile Law
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 이진기
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第27卷 第1號, 175~211쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Mercantile law is a lex specialis of the civil law. However, mercantile law does not completely fulfill the legal demand for commercial transactions, and is applied with civil law. Therefore, the statement that mercantile law is a special type of civil law should be recognized in such a way that an article in civil law, in correspondence to an article of mercantile law, should follow the article in mercantile law. If an institution of civil law repeats itself in specific institution of mercantile law and its subjects, the only way to integrate the two based on civil law that applies to basic law is to start from the results of legal research of mercantile institution. On the contrary, the casual approach which starts from legal theories denies the peculiar and independent characteristics of mercantile law and is seen as an approach that does not fully consider the peculiarities of the law from reality. However, it is noticeable that especially field of commercial activities and commercial general provisions that accentuates their relation to civil law is in a blind spot, far from the area of main interest for mercantile law. The prerequisite requirements for the integration of civil law and mercantile law in way of legal theories, and not simply the integration of the two, have to be approved by the legal sources and the aspects of mercantile law. If not approved, the integration would not be plausible. Art. 1 Commercial Code for the existing forms of law for commercial transactions states, if the original law by business affairs does not have regulations, rely on mercantile law and if there is no mercantile law, follow regulations of civil law . Studies of mercantile law often analyze that mercantile law is based on general principles od civil law, but they also state that the field in which civil law applies is different from the field in which mercantile applies, and therefore agree that civil law does not equal the area in which mercantile law can be applied to. As a result, it is said, Art. 1 Commercial Code is no more than the regulation of applied law of order that relate to business affairs. Nonetheless, nowadays, the definition on merchants and commercial activities does not only completely lack the skill, but they also we can conclude that civil law lacks the characteristics of special relation laws from the fact that the function of civil law as a basic law has been disregarded. Thus, from the perspective of the legal sources, the basic for the integration of civil law and mercantile law has already been established. On the other hand, the attitude of trying to approving general terms and conditions and commercial autonome rules that apply to the interpretation of business affairs as a part of law is improper, because in order to be approved, they should have to have solid foundation in (real-world) law. Next, the distinction between customary mercantile law and (real-world) mercantile law is unclear. The distinction is unclear especially between customary mercantile law and factual mercantile custom, but considering that the supreme court established that customary mercantile law is a law with an effect to fulfill which exists objectiv, the dibate about a customary mercantile law is now exhaustive. From an aspect, the fact that that customary mercantile law and true customs are approved by the court’s trial activities is not any different from any others. Furthermore, we cannot deny that commercial transactional practices play a big role in trial activities, unlike civil law, but we must keep in mind that this is only in theory. Finally, the codification of laws enacted is centered on ideas of reform, integration and rationalization, and such philosophy is achieved through legal amendments.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 민상법전의 입법 - 비교법적 소개
Ⅲ. 조화로운 민․상법제도의 구성을 위한 전제
Ⅳ. 개별규정의 비교․검토: 행위능력과 법인, 대리
Ⅴ. 글을 마치며
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 부당이득에서 급부, 침해 그리고 단순한 이익의 귀속
- Patents System and Negative Externalities of R&D
- 판례상 합의해지에 관한 화해
- 다수당사자의 채권관계
- 유럽계약법상 신의성실의 원칙의 내용과 우리민법의 시사점
- 자동차사고 피해자의 합의 후 사정변경에 따른 손해배상금 산정시 부당이득반환과 기판력에 관한 판례연구
- 원시적 불능에 관한 민법 제535조의 개정에 관한 연구
- 민․상법의 통일적 법제도의 정비를 위한 조건
- 예금채권으로 된 압류금지채권에 대한 압류 및 상계에 관한 소고
- 不動産 二重賣買에 관한 立法論的 考察
- 아파트 분양 광고와 시공사의 법적 책임
- 福祉型信託 導入을 통한 民事信託의 活性化
- 단체보험계약에 관한 소고
- 중화인민공화국 물권법(2007년)의 물권변동에 관한 연구
- 環境侵害의 留止請求
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!