학술논문
예금채권으로 된 압류금지채권에 대한 압류 및 상계에 관한 소고
이용수 156
- 영문명
- A Study on the Prohibition of Set-offs and Seizure of Nongarnishable Bank Account
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 박지원(Park, Ji Won)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第27卷 第1號, 357~387쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Judgment Creditor(hereinafter, ‘Creditor’) may force any property belonged to the Judgment Debtor(hereinafter, ‘Debtor’) to be sold upon public auction on his or her own choice. Hence Creditor also may as garnish any right to Debtor's wage or bank deposit as he or she can attach Debtor's tangible assets. However, certain personal property or right to credit(right to ask payment) are exempt from garnishment to protect disadvantaged people who scraped a living with these assets. The problem arises when Creditor tries to seize account where fulfillment of nongarnishable obligation, namely non-seizable money, is deposited. In Korea,
The Court consistently held that Creditor can seize or levy bank account where nongarnishable amount of money is deposit. The Court reasons that the nongarnishable nature will be cease to exist where nongarnishable right is merged into garnishable right by making a deposit into account. because it is practically impossible to differentiate nongarnishable from garnishable. The Court suggest that the Debtor may apply for revocation of seizure or change of seized amount, then it will protect the Debtor upon considering the legislative purpose of listing nongarnishable rights. The reasoning of the Court may be logically right but not practically. It is
too conceptual to achieve the public purpose of protecting the socially-disadvantaged. Most of them have never been legally educated enough to know that they should apply for revocation to the Court. Furthermore, it is
practically impossible for them to be relieved under current Korean scheme in some cases, because the Debtor cannot apply for revocation after the balance is turned over to the Creditor through Bank Levy. Namely, the Court would issue seizure of bank account and bank levy at the same time in practice, and the Debtor may be in lack of time for application. Another problems arises where the Bank is both a Creditor and a Debtor.
The Korean Commentators have not shown an interest on this problem, however, the situation goes serious where the Creditor Bank set-offs its Credit with Debt. Unlike execution of court judgment, the exercise of the right of set-off is very easy thanks to its informality; The bank would just say set-off, ant that is it. Hence, the purpose of protecting the poor can more easily be detoured under this circumstances. So, I hereby suggest the protection though amendments of applied Acts will be best resolution. If it takes time, the Court should apply its interpretation more leniently. Hence, it will be better off, if the court may interpret nongarnishable nature is maintained where it is not practically impossible to differentiate nongarnishable from garnishable.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 채권 압류금지의 범위와 위반시의 구제
Ⅲ. 예금채권으로된 압류금지채권에 대한 압류와 상계
Ⅳ. 일본에서의 논의와 시사점
Ⅴ. 마치며
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 부당이득에서 급부, 침해 그리고 단순한 이익의 귀속
- Patents System and Negative Externalities of R&D
- 판례상 합의해지에 관한 화해
- 다수당사자의 채권관계
- 유럽계약법상 신의성실의 원칙의 내용과 우리민법의 시사점
- 자동차사고 피해자의 합의 후 사정변경에 따른 손해배상금 산정시 부당이득반환과 기판력에 관한 판례연구
- 원시적 불능에 관한 민법 제535조의 개정에 관한 연구
- 민․상법의 통일적 법제도의 정비를 위한 조건
- 예금채권으로 된 압류금지채권에 대한 압류 및 상계에 관한 소고
- 不動産 二重賣買에 관한 立法論的 考察
- 아파트 분양 광고와 시공사의 법적 책임
- 福祉型信託 導入을 통한 民事信託의 活性化
- 단체보험계약에 관한 소고
- 중화인민공화국 물권법(2007년)의 물권변동에 관한 연구
- 環境侵害의 留止請求
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!