학술논문
峿堂 李象秀의 散文批評論 硏究
이용수 181
- 영문명
- Study on Prose Criticism of Uedang, Sangsoo Lee
- 발행기관
- 어문연구학회
- 저자명
- 이향배(Hyang-Bae Lee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『어문연구』語文硏究 第56輯, 191~217쪽, 전체 27쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 한국어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.04.30
6,040원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study examines the prose criticism by Sangsoo Lee. He was concerned about the deterioration of customs that respect scholars and letters caused by the unfair practice of the Goageo (State Examination). He criticized scholars who bribed sons of influential families to buy their governmental positions, and emphasized the attitude of scholars who depend on heaven"s will to enter into governmental positions after making themselves proficient.
Sangsoo Lee considered close and analytic reading important to write well. In those times, most scholars devoted themselves to studying poetry and prose to pass the Goageo so they memorized some phrases without closely reading the entire work. Thus, he presented a reading method to understand the deeper meaning of the passages because he thought it was an urgent goal to raise the level of reading. For good reading, readers must find the main purport first and then the conclusion. To find the conclusion is possible by analyses of arrangement, order, contextual connection, and organization into paragraphs. He believed that these analyses help readers to understand what meanings the authors wanted to deliver. He also thought that analytical reading was prerequisite to become a good writer.
Songsoo Lee was interested in the ancient texts as well. He classified the existing letters by "mun" and "pil" of Gogonggi, He considered Sigi of Samacheon and the ancient text of Hanyu as "pil". He argued that the scope of the ancient texts must be expanded to Byunryomun because "mun" means Daewomun. He thought he could acheive the truth through "mun." For bimun, he laid stress on "ganum" but he did not follow the old law unconditionally and pursued "bimun" that could fit to the time.
He found out the main purport, the conclusion, and descriptive techniques through the analytical examination of Hokrijon and Hoasikjon. He mostly analyzed the style and structure of the writing rather than its content to grasp what Samacheon"s intention was and what style he was using. This task needs critical perspectives towards writing and insights as a writer.
Sangsoo Lee considered close and analytic reading important to write well. In those times, most scholars devoted themselves to studying poetry and prose to pass the Goageo so they memorized some phrases without closely reading the entire work. Thus, he presented a reading method to understand the deeper meaning of the passages because he thought it was an urgent goal to raise the level of reading. For good reading, readers must find the main purport first and then the conclusion. To find the conclusion is possible by analyses of arrangement, order, contextual connection, and organization into paragraphs. He believed that these analyses help readers to understand what meanings the authors wanted to deliver. He also thought that analytical reading was prerequisite to become a good writer.
Songsoo Lee was interested in the ancient texts as well. He classified the existing letters by "mun" and "pil" of Gogonggi, He considered Sigi of Samacheon and the ancient text of Hanyu as "pil". He argued that the scope of the ancient texts must be expanded to Byunryomun because "mun" means Daewomun. He thought he could acheive the truth through "mun." For bimun, he laid stress on "ganum" but he did not follow the old law unconditionally and pursued "bimun" that could fit to the time.
He found out the main purport, the conclusion, and descriptive techniques through the analytical examination of Hokrijon and Hoasikjon. He mostly analyzed the style and structure of the writing rather than its content to grasp what Samacheon"s intention was and what style he was using. This task needs critical perspectives towards writing and insights as a writer.
목차
一. 序論
二. 峿堂의 學文과 科擧 文風 批判
三. 作文 理論과 批評의 實際
四. 結論
參考文獻
二. 峿堂의 學文과 科擧 文風 批判
三. 作文 理論과 批評의 實際
四. 結論
參考文獻
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 論文硏究 편집 및 심사규정 외
- 심층 언어와 무의식의 글쓰기 : 이상
- 아방가르드의 한국적 수용과 초현실성 - 李箱과 趙鄕의 경우
- 17세기 여성대상 산문의 남성의 여성인식과 여성의 삶
- 해성가ㆍ도솔가의 일원론적 세계관과 민심의 조화
- 峿堂 李象秀의 散文批評論 硏究
- 한국어 교육에서의 문법화 과정 중에 있는 형태에 대한 연구 - {-ㄹ테-}를 중심으로
- 수정과 피드백이 글쓰기에서 동인(動因)이 되는 방식을 위한 탐구
- 구활자본 고소설 『丙寅洋擾』 연구
- 국어 명사구의 유형에 대하여
- 읽기와 쓰기의 통합적 접근을 통한 글쓰기 방법론
- 서정주 초기시에 나타나는 감금의 공간 메타포 연구
- 텔레비전 드라마 〈굿바이 솔로〉 연구 - 예술성과 대중성을 중심으로
- 백봉래의 서경론 연구 - 편집비평적 성격을 중심으로
- 무안지역 왕건전설의 특성과 문화론적 활용
- 에밀레종 전설의 근원과 전래
- 김혜순 시에 나타난 신체 지칭어의 성격
- 설화 읽기에 대한 반성적 고찰
- 문어 텍스트와 구어 텍스트의 담화 표지와 텍스트 구조 비교 연구
- 동해지역문학의 ‘바다시’ 연구 - 『동해문학』을 중심으로
- 수기에 나타난 식민적 징후와 50년대 동일성 담론 - 『나는 코리안의 아내』와 『女苑』을 중심으로
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!