日帝强占期 調書裁判의 實態

• 영문명: The Role of the Transcripts of Pretrial Interrogation in Criminal Trial under the Japanese Seizure of Korea(1909-1945)
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 심희기(Sim Hui-Gi)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제25권, 331~354쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.06.01

영문 초록

  Pretrial dossiers, which have been prepared by investigative officials, play a great role in modern Korea. Critical commentators criticize the phenomena as "Cho-so(pretrial dossiers) trial" in the negative sense. The purpose of this paper is to chase the historical origin of the "Cho-so trial" in great detail, especially from under the Japanese Seizure of Korea(1909-1945). Section Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ examine in detail the main features of it from the perspective of German principle of immediacy and Anglo-American hearsay rule.
  Although the European system broadly mirrors the common law process - each has a three-stage process of investigation, some form of probable cause hearing, and trial -a number of differences mark the Continental trial process. In both systems, the police are largely responsible for pre-trial investigation; but in Europe, they perform their investigation under the supervision of an independent, unelected magistrate or public prosecutor. The police are largely responsible for pre-trial investigation, they perform their investigation under the supervision of an independent, unelected magistrate or public prosecutor. The investigation consists largely of interviewing witnesses and the suspect; from these interviews the dossier, a complete written summary of the interviews, is developed. Those summaries of the interviews had been played a determinant role since Japanese Seizure of Korea(1909-1945). This is the reason why call for "criminal justice reform" arise continuously in modern Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. ‘1912년 형사령’과 ‘메이지 법’ 시기(1912-1923)와 직접주의
Ⅲ. ‘1924년 형사령’과 ‘다이쇼 법’ 시행시기(1924-1945)와 직접주의
Ⅳ. 조서재판을 생성시킨 물적 조건과 조서재판에 수반되는 법적 현상들
Ⅴ. 1954년 형사소송법과 일제강점기 조서재판: 연속인가 단절인가?
Ⅵ. 결어
[Abstract]

키워드

조서재판 직접주의 공판중심주의