「奈城誌」의 창작배경과 역사담론

• 영문명: A Study on Background of creating and a Narrative Discourse of Nae-Sung-Ji
• 발행기관: 동양한문학회(구 부산한문학회)
• 저자명: 손종태(Son.Jong-Tae)
• 간행물 정보: 『동양한문학연구』동양한문학연구 제19집, 87~115쪽, 전체 29쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2004.06.01

영문 초록

The novel Nae-Sung-Ji(奈城誌)was written by Kim Soo-min(金壽民)(known as Myung-Eun(明隱)) who had lived during the Youngjo to Jungjo period. This novel can be found in a collection of his writings called Myong-Eun-Jip. The bases of the Nae-Sung-Ji novel is about the following; In a dream, the hero Moo-Myong-ja met the faithful leader of Chosun and faithful leader. of Myong. Together, they had a party and talked about Gye-Yu-Iung-Lan, Moo-O-Sa-Hwa and the restoration of Danjong. They also created poetry together. Finally, the dream was over and he woke up. This study deals with the creation background, the narration development and how the work was structured. This study also tries to find the meaning of the narration discourse. The summary of this study is as follows; In the chapter 2, I reviewed the life and works of Kim Soo-min. He respected the Joo country and also had a No-Lon view of the world. He was indifferent to politics and was only interested in writing. The creation background of Nae-Sung-Ji expresses the faithfulness of the people who were enshrined in Suk-Mo-Jun at the Dong-Hak Temple. In the chapter 3, I reviewed the narration development first and then, how the work was structured. The narration development is divided into(Mong-Jun),(Mong-Joong), and(Gak-Mong). Let’s specifi치y look into the(Mong-Joong)area which is a kernel of a question.(Mong-Joong)was expanded into(Entrance(1)-Sitting- Rehearsal(1)-Entrance(2)-Debate(1)-Debate(2)-Rehearsal(2)} Sometimes the (Entrance)field can go in and out of other fields, but it still draws a clear distinction between the(Entrance),(Sitting)and (Rehearsal)fields. The reason for a clear. division between(Entrance 1 and 2),(Rehearsal 1 and 2)and(Debate 1 and 2), tells us that the acute debate of the day did the role of mitigation. Therefore, the expansion and repetition of the narration development is justified. I looked into how the work was structured by dividing it into 3 parts; the people, the event and the background. The people are divided into: ① Danjong and Geon-Mun-Hwang-Je as the hosts of the party.②Seong Sam-mun and Bang Hyo-yu as the People who judge. ③ Sa-Yuk-Sin, as faithful countrymen and loyalists that stand by their king. ④The faithful loyalists of the two countries.⑤ People of the lower classes who do not think much of the life. The event is divided into; ① Controversy over the appointment of a gatekeeper.②Controversy over admission. ③ Controversy over sitting, ④ Controversy over Mu-O-Sa-Hwa, ⑤ Controversy over the order of priority that the work should be given.⑥Controversy over the rewards granted after the examination of their services.⑦ Controversy over the inversion of Maeng-Ja and Chun-Chu. ⑧Controversy over Myung-Chul-Bon-Sin(明哲本身). ⑨ Controversy over the way of Heaven. The background is examined in Time Background called ‘Hwang-Myeong-Yeong-Ryeok’and in Spatial Background called ‘Nae-Sung’. In the 4th chapter, I looked at the narration discourse in the Nae-Sung-Ji novel. The narration discourse is divided into 3 problems; ① The throne usurpation problem. ②The suspicion way of Heaven problem. ③ The genuine loyalty problem. The writer was writing about a problem which was so acutely opposed during the 18th, 19th century. He did 상 lis through a style called Mong-U-Rok. In the 5th chapter, I arrange the things to look into, 18th century that Kim Su-min existed was the time which the task is achieved to clarify loyal retainer who is connected, he wrote the Nae-Sung-Ji in such course. The intention to write Nae-Sung-Ji is to clear loyal retainer and traitor who existed historically by the style of penman- ship, general idea of Chun-Chu and own justice idea. Nae-Sung-Ji acted a role of midway in the time which is the style of Mong-U-Rok became a long work narration.

목차

Ⅰ.문제 제기

Ⅱ.「奈城誌」의 창작배경

Ⅲ.「奈城誌」의 역사담론

Ⅳ.결론

참고문헌

Abstract