학술논문
한국 불법행위법에 관한 최근 입법 논의
이용수 50
- 영문명
- Recent Arguments for Reformation of Korean Civil Code
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 김천수(Kim, Cheon Soo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제57호, 3~39쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2011.12.31
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
There have been several arguments for the reformation of Korean Civil Code(hereafter “KCC ). The past official ones could be found in “Proposal for Reformation of the Tort Law of KCC , a report by KCC Reformation Committee of the Korean Association of Civil Law in 1995 (hereafter “1995 Argument ) and a bill for the reformation of KCC by the Korean Ministry of Law in 2004 (hereafter “2004 Argument ). The 1995 argument was just an academic one. The bill of 2004 argument was discarded owing to the session termination of the Korean National Assembly. The third official argument is now in process by the KCC Reformation Committee organized by the Korean Ministry of Law in 2009 (hereafter Present Argument ). This paper aims at comparing and analyzing the critical issues in the three arguments focussed on the reformation of tort law in KCC. The sections of the tort law of KCC could be divided into three parts including the sections for the general rules of tort law, the sections for the special tort liability, and the other sections. The sections for the general rules are Section 750 through Section 752. The most critical issue of reformation of the sections is the basic system. The present tort law of KCC is ruled under one principle of fault liability. It has some exceptional sections which are properly classified as ones for strict liability. Some professors in 1995 Argument have suggested that KCC have a general section for strict liability. If the suggestion would be adopted, the tort law of KCC would have the two general sections for fault liability and strict liability respectively. The 2004 Argument did not adopted the suggestion. The Present Argument did not decided on such an issue. The present writer supports the suggestion in 1995 Argument. The other issues in the sections for the general rules include legally protected interests, emotional distress, money payable periodically and remedies. The sections for the special tort liability are Section 753 through Section 755 for guardian s liability, Section 756 for vicarious liability, Section 758 for possessor s liability, and Section 760 for joint tort liability. The critical issue of reformation of the Section 755 is the liability of guardian whose child is a tortfeasor without any mental incapacity. All of 1995 Argument, 2004 Argument and Present Argument adopt the new rule for such a liability of guardian. The critical issues of reformation of the Section 756 are the defenses by the employer and his or her right to indemnity. All of 1995 Argument, 2004 Argument and Present Argument support the abolition of the rule for the defenses of the employer and the adoption of rule for the restriction of his or her right. One of the critical issues of reformation of the Section 758 is who should be the defendant. According to the present rule, the owner would be a defendant only when the occupier has the defenses against the liability. There has been a suggestion that the owner should be a defendant regardless of the occupier s defenses. The suggestion was not accepted in 2004 Argument. Present Argument adopts it. The other issues include objects causing the damage, the condition of the object, and defenses. There are also many issues in the argument for the reformation of the Section 760. The most critical one is the mitigation of the liability of defendant whose level of contribution to damage is very low. The sub-committee for the tort law of the KCC Reformation Committee organized by the Korean Ministry of Law in 2009 accepts the rule for mitigation of his or her liability. The issues of reforming the other sections include the defenses of tort liability, the extinctive prescription of claim for damages, the injunction, and the punitive damages. The sub-committee submitted the pro
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 불법행위법의 체계 및 기본 규정에 관한 논의
Ⅲ. 특수불법행위에 관한 논의
Ⅳ. 기타 논의
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 인격권에 관한 입법제안
- 책임경합의 제한과 개방: 중국합동법 제122조의 해석과 적용
- 현대통신수단의 대규모불법행위에서 징벌적배상제도의 구성
- 대만에서 인격권에 대한 불법행위책임
- 한국 불법행위법에 관한 최근 입법 논의
- 한국의 위험책임 현황과 입법 논의
- 「人法」에서 본 불법행위법의 전개
- 부당이득과 불법행위
- 혈우병 치료를 위한 혈액제제의 투여 후에 나타난 HIV감염에 대한 책임
- 계약과 불법행위
- 중과실 개념에 대하여
- 한국에서의 퍼블리시티권 논의
- 일반불법행위책임 성립요건으로 ‘위법성’이 필요한가
- 언론자유와 명예권보호
- 대만 불법행위법의 발전
- 일반적 인격권의 개념과 체계설정에 관한 연구
- 혼인관계 보호에 대한 대만의 불법행위법
- 과실상계
- 피용자의 「직무집행」 개념의 재검토: 대만법의 사례를 중심으로
- 대만 제조물책임법의 발전
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- 발달 장애인의 사회참여에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구
- 발달장애 근로 청년의 1인 가구 자립생활 지원 욕구에 관한 연구: 장애 당사자⋅보호자⋅지원인력을 중심으로
- 장애인재활상담사 보수교육 운영에 관한 인식 연구: 재활관련 기관 종사자 FGI를 기반으로
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!