본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

미국 불법행위법상 동산 제공자의 책임

이용수 15

영문명
Liability of Persons Supplying Chattels for the Use of Others in American Tort Law- focusing on Negligence Provisions in the Restatement of Torts -
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
고세일(Se-il Ko)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제61호, 375~422쪽, 전체 48쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.12.31
8,560

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Although the Restatements of Torts may not be American positive law, the Restatement is a good guide to understand American Tort law. In this regard, this author has examined chapter 14, liability of persons supplying chattels for the use of others, in the Restatements of (Second) Torts in this article. This Restatement chapter has 7 topics: rules applicable to all suppliers; persons supplying chattels to be used for their business purposes; manufacturers of chattels; sellers of chattels manufactured by third persons; strict liability; independent contractors; donors, lenders, and lessors of chattels. While having studied the sections 388 through 408 of the Restatement of (Second) Torts, this author has found its relation with general principles of chapter 12 in the Restatement of Torts and its independent functions, in which American Tort Law has evolved, with American Contact Law. In the meantime, this author may be able to look at a big picture of negligence in American Tort Law. This author has realized that the rules of liability of persons supplying chattels for the use of others also have provided basis rules of modern product strict liability, such as sections 402A and 402B. In addition, while liability rules of chattels suppliers have worked to cure harms and injuries occurred by torts in this area, its core provision is the section 388. Thus other sections (389 through 408) have been slight variation rules from the section 388. The rules and discussions in sections 388 through 408 in the Restatement of (Second) Torts may be similar to ‘warranty liability of sale contract’ in the Korean Civil Code, ‘positive contract violation,’ which Korean courts have mentioned, and ‘Korean Product Liability Act.’ The American Tort rules of chattels suppliers’ liability also have different aspects comparing to such Korean warranty liability of sale contract, positive contract violation and current Korean Product Liability Act. In this regard, this author explains these similarities and differences between both countries’ rules. Finally this author attempts to suggest what the sections 388 through 408 of the Restatement of (Second) Torts may work for Korean Tort Law.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 타인이 이용하는 동산 제공자의 책임
Ⅲ. 무과실책임, 독립계약자와 대여자의 책임
Ⅳ. 맺으면서
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

고세일(Se-il Ko). (2012).미국 불법행위법상 동산 제공자의 책임. 민사법학, (61), 375-422

MLA

고세일(Se-il Ko). "미국 불법행위법상 동산 제공자의 책임." 민사법학, .61(2012): 375-422

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제