커뮤니케이션 정보소구방법의 차이에 따른 문화유산 해설판의 유효성 비교

• 영문명: Comparing the Effectiveness of Interpretation Boards on Cultural Heritage Resources by Using a Communication Information Appeal Method
• 발행기관: 한국관광학회
• 저자명: 한상현
• 간행물 정보: 『관광학연구』제36권 제9호, 177~196쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 관광학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.11.30

영문 초록

This study recognizes the occurrence of that interpretation boards concerning the cognitive information appeal method are being neglected by people as they do not have any effect on interpretation. Alternatively, it is proved that an affective information appeal method has a great effect, not only on interpretation but also on interest and satisfaction. The interpretation board of Gyerim in Gyeongju as a site was selected to verify this issue. For the study, the same information was given - one with a cognitive appeal and the other with an affective appeal - to make a valid comparison between a cognitive appeal method and an affective appeal method. We surveyed visitors who read the cognitive appeal board and the affective appeal board respectively. The research includes visitor’s opinions pertaining to the effectiveness of interpretation and visitor’s satisfactions depending on methods. The results show that the affective appeal methods are considered better than the cognitive appeal in terms of effectiveness interpretation. In conclusion, the research suggests the use of an effective information appeal method for cultural heritage resources.

목차

I. 서론

II. 이론적 배경

III. 연구방법

IV. 분석결과

V. 결론 및 시사점

참고문헌

키워드

정보소구 인지적소구 정서적소구 해설판 Information appeal Cognitive appeal Affective appeal Interpretation board