본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

특별법상 추징의 법적 성격

이용수 7

영문명
Legal Character of the Additional Collection in Criminal Special Act
발행기관
한국형사판례연구회
저자명
이승현(Lee, Seung Hyun)
간행물 정보
『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제18권, 640~675쪽, 전체 36쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2010.06.30
7,120

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

As crimes generating huge sum of benefit such as organized crimes, narcotic crimes, and pornography related crimes have been increasing, criminal special act intends to make a redemption for the benefits from criminal acts by the provisions of forfeit or additional collection. Generally, forfeit based on criminal law is characterized as security measure in that it prevents from keeping unlawful benefits by depriving criminals of profit from the wrongful acts. Therefore,when suspended sentence is added to the primary sentence, suspended sentence can be imposed to the additional collection. However, it is not available if it is not added to the primary sentence. Independent appeal on the additional collection is also impossible if there is no appeal for the final judgement. On the contrary, the additional collection from Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc, Customs Act, and Act on aggravated punishment, etc. of specific economic crimes is characterized as a punishment based on the fact of crime. However, in the targeted case, it is questionable that special laws consider the additional collection as punishment. Punitive additional collection is unfavorable to the offender because it can be imposed even though there is no actual benefit from the wrongful acts. Moreover, it is not reasonable to impose not only jointed additional collection based on civil law but also punishment. It is contradictory to the responsibility principle that criminal law calls for and the way of weighing of an offense. Additional collection to a person who simply transport or keep some goods, not to the person who obtain the goods, is not appropriate to the responsibility principle of criminal law. In this respect, the scope of the additional collection needs to be narrowed and it seems to be more reasonable to use the concept of deprivation of benefits from criminal acts.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 추징에 관한 일반적 고찰
Ⅲ. 형사특별법상 추징의 법적 성격
Ⅳ. 추징의 성격에 따른 부수적인 문제
Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이승현(Lee, Seung Hyun). (2010).특별법상 추징의 법적 성격. 형사판례연구, 18 (1), 640-675

MLA

이승현(Lee, Seung Hyun). "특별법상 추징의 법적 성격." 형사판례연구, 18.1(2010): 640-675

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제