‘아동·청소년이용음란물’의 개념 및 판단기준

• 영문명: A Study on the Term and the Standard of Judgment of “Child or Juvenile Pornography”
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 이창섭(Lee, Chang-Sup)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제24권, 527~556쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2016.06.30

영문 초록

Recently, the Supreme Court suggested the standard of judgment of “child or juvenile pornography” where persons or representations that can be perceived as children or juveniles appear(2013Do4503). According to the standard, a depiction’s main content, appearances, states of physical development and identities of the characters, etc. must be considered in judging whether it is “child or juvenile pornography” or not, and it is not to be easily concluded that the depiction is “child or juvenile pornography”, even if the characters look somewhat younger. But I guess that this standard will not have a great effect on the judgment, because there are the conceptual element of “can be” and the principle of “in dubio pro reo”. From the point of view of the principle of clarity, the use of the conceptual element like “can be” is to be restrained in articles of criminal law, if possible. Therefore, it is proper that the term “child or juvenile pornography” should be reorganized as a depiction where real persons appear. The gap of punishment resulting from here will not happen. Criminal Act and Information and Communications Network Act will bridge the gap.

목차

[대상판결] 대법원 2014. 9. 24. 선고 2013도4503 판결

[연구]

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. ‘아동·청소년이용음란물’ 개념의 문제점

Ⅲ. 아동·청소년이 관련된 음란물에 대한 비교법적 검토

Ⅳ. 대상판결에 대한 소감(所感)

Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

아동·청소년이용음란물 표현물 의심스러운 때에는 피고인의 이익으로 명확성의 원칙 처벌의 공백 child or juvenile pornography representations in dubio pro reo principle of clarity gap of punishment