외국중재판정의 승인거부사유에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A study for the refusing enforcement on Foreign Arbitral Awards: Focus on the International Public Policy
• 발행기관: 한국통상정보학회
• 저자명: 박종돈(Jong-Don Park)
• 간행물 정보: 『통상정보연구』제8권 제1호, 1~13쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.03.30

영문 초록

All over the country tries to clarify the content of ‘Public Policy’ in recognition and implementation of Foreign Arbitral Awards：it makes comments of the international consensus of Geneva Convention(1927), New York Convention(1958) and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Policy, and it takes a general view of domestic laws how they deal with Public policy and Foreign Arbitral Awards. Foreign Arbitral Awards should be appropriately respected and implementation by the courts of countries encourage parties in a legal procedure to refuse enforcement by invoking “Public Policy.” In order to cope with such invocations, the purport of the above recommendation on Foreign Arbitral Awards should be internationally recognized and the exceptional circumstances should be restricted unless the International Court of Arbitral Awards is not established a Dr. Holtzmann/Schwebel brought forward. In this paper suggests the list of the exceptional circumstances. Korean Arbitration Law stipulates as the Civil proceeding Law did, “good morals and the social order of the Republic of Korea” as a ground for refusing enforcement of Arbitral Awards. Studies on counteraction against invocations of Public Policy to refuse enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards should be developed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 공서양속의 해석

Ⅲ. 제외국의 입법례

Ⅳ. 공서양속에 관한 국제협정 및 모델법

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

Foreign Arbitral Awards Public Policy UNCITRAL Model Law