국제분쟁해결센터(ICDR)의 ‘긴급구제’제도(‘emergency relief’ system)에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the ‘Emergency Relief’ System of International Centre for Dispute Resolution
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 오원석 김용일
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제21권 제1호, 239~257쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.03.30

영문 초록

This article examines the requirements of Article 37 of the ICDR International Arbitration Rules and issues that could arise if a party petitions a U.S. Federal Court to enforce an emergency arbitrator’s Article 37 decision to grant pre-arbitration provisional relief. On May 1, 2006, ICDR introduced a new procedure for the granting of emergency arbitral relief under its ICDR Rules. The procedure enables a party to apply for emergency interim relief before the appointment of an arbitrator or tribunal to adjudicate the merits of the dispute. Instead, the application for emergency relief is considered by an emergency arbitrator appointed by the ICDR. In short, the ICDR has quickly appointed emergency arbitrator and resolved a challenge to an appointment within 36 hours. In addition, the emergency decisions have been issued within just a couple of weeks. In particular, we looked at what would happen after Article 37 emergency relief is granted. Based on my examination of U.S. cases on the enforceability of interim awards and orders, We conclude that U.S. courts would enforce Article 37 interim measures, whether they are characterized by the emergency arbitrator as an interim order or award. Where the situation warrants, arbitration executives should embrace and use emergency relief procedure of ICDR Rules.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언

Ⅱ. 제37조의 내용과 적용사례

Ⅲ. 긴급구제의 절차

Ⅳ. 긴급구제 판정의 집행

Ⅴ. 결언

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

키워드

국제분쟁해결센터 중재규칙 긴급구제 임시적 차분 긴급구제 판정의 집행 ICDR Rules Emergency Relief Interim Measures Enforceability of Interim Awards